Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 5 to paragraph 41

The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basins

Vote
Amendment 5 to paragraph 41
Result
186 for · 441 against · 10 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
20 May 2026, 13:25
More facts (6)
Position
vote 3 of 8 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ESN
Official label
A10-0120/2026 – Stéphanie Yon-Courtin – § 41 – Am 5
Vote id
192736
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 186 for, 441 against, 10 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 29 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 42Abst. 0No vote 3 of 45Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 49Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 1Against 119Abst. 0No vote 16 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 0Against 72Abst. 0No vote 5 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 1Against 148Abst. 3No vote 31 of 183Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
ECRFor 68Against 4Abst. 0No vote 9 of 81Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.92
PatriotsFor 79Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 26Against 0Abst. 0No vote 1 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 11Against 7Abst. 7No vote 5 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium020
Germany040
Denmark010
Spain040
Finland030
France090
Greece020
Ireland030
Italy0100
Netherlands010
Portugal010
Sweden020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 637 members

No vote recorded, 80

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 80 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
10 Jul 2025Amendment 4 to paragraph 8 Future of the EU biotechnology and biomanufacturing sector: leveraging research, boosting innovation and enhancing competitivenessAmendment193 for, 443 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.97 572 voters
3 Apr 2025Amendment 14, adding text after recital 2 Amending Directives (EU) 2022/2464 and (EU) 2024/1760 as regards the dates from which Member States are to apply certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment180 for, 403 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 524 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 72, adding text after paragraph 39 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034Amendment186 for, 446 against, 17 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 592 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
10 Jul 2025Amendment 3 to paragraph 1 Future of the EU biotechnology and biomanufacturing sector: leveraging research, boosting innovation and enhancing competitivenessAmendment192 for, 462 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.96 579 voters
11 Sept 2025Amendment 3 to paragraph 6 Case of Victoire Ingabire in RwandaAmendment160 for, 407 against, 27 abstained Rejected For 27 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 529 voters
21 May 2026Amendment 7 to recital AY The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forwardAmendment175 for, 378 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.96 537 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 7 to paragraph 3, introductory part Trajectory to decrease the contribution of high indirect land-use change-risk biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels to renewable energy targetsAmendment188 for, 465 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 585 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 50 to paragraph 117 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionAmendment198 for, 445 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.96 592 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 2, adding text after recital G Trajectory to decrease the contribution of high indirect land-use change-risk biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels to renewable energy targetsAmendment190 for, 464 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 587 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 5 to recital N EU-Uzbekistan Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (resolution)Amendment191 for, 448 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.96 634 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 8 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 5 to paragraph 41 — The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basins”. Vote, 20 May 2026. votingId 192736, reference 2024/2126(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/192736 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 20 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 20 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-20, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-05-20/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-05-20-192736,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 5 to paragraph 41 — The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basins}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-05-20},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/192736}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/192736},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 192736, reference 2024/2126(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-20 (CC BY 4.0)}
}