Skip to content

Decision

The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basins

Effect
Adopted
Result
518 for · 31 against · 102 abstained roll call
Date
20 May 2026, 13:24–13:26
Kind
Resolution
More facts (9)
Margin
by a large majority
Source
Committee report by Stéphanie Yon-Courtin
Topics
Climate & environmentAgriculture, food & fisheries Assigned by a model, not checked by hand.
Votes
8 votes · 8 roll calls · 7 amendments
Requested by
The Left (1 roll call) · Patriots (1 roll call) · ESN (1 roll call)
Final vote
192483
More

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Final vote: 518 for, 31 against, 102 abstained (roll call).

Adopted by a large majority.

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 7 amendments (7 rejected).

Backed by S&D, Renew, EPP, ECR, Patriots and ESN; The Left and Greens mostly abstained.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 2Against 11Abst. 30No vote 2 of 45Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.55
GreensFor 2Against 1Abst. 46No vote 4 of 53Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.91
S&DFor 99Against 14Abst. 9No vote 14 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.72
RenewFor 68Against 0Abst. 4No vote 5 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.92
EPPFor 156Against 2Abst. 1No vote 24 of 183Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
ECRFor 76Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 81Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 78Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 24Against 0Abst. 2No vote 1 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.88
No groupFor 13Against 3Abst. 10No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Voted against their group, 48

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast, at least 10 members voting) of the group they sat in that day. A group without a clear line is divided and not counted.

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

Votes by country (27 delegations)
Members' votes by country. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Cohesion: Agreement Index of the delegation, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all the same; it reflects the mix of groups (method).
CountryForAgainstAbst.No voteCohesion
Austria125210.45
Belgium170410.71
Bulgaria120051.00
Cyprus2004—
Czechia190200.86
Germany54142350.39
Denmark61800.30
Estonia6001—
Spain470490.88
Finland93210.46
France58013100.73
Greece152220.68
Croatia100110.86
Hungary160031.00
Ireland110300.68
Italy5601370.72
Lithuania100100.86
Luxembourg4020—
Latvia8010—
Malta2004—
Netherlands2011000.47
Poland463220.85
Portugal180210.85
Romania270150.95
Sweden132510.47
Slovenia7011—
Slovakia130021.00

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 651 members

Debate speakers and how they voted

Members who spoke in the plenary debate on the dossier. Speeches: how many times they took the floor. Final vote: their recorded position on this decision's final roll call.
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
Stéphanie YON-COURTIN FranceRenewSpeeches218 May 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Paulo DO NASCIMENTO CABRAL PortugalEPPSpeeches218 May 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
João OLIVEIRA PortugalThe LeftSpeeches218 May 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Abstained
Esteban GONZÁLEZ PONS SpainEPPSpeeches118 May 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Sander SMIT changed group NetherlandsECRSpeeches118 May 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Željana ZOVKO CroatiaEPPSpeeches118 May 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Show the other 17 speakers
Debate speakers, continued
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
France JAMET FrancePatriotsSpeeches118 May 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Magdalena ADAMOWICZ PolandEPPSpeeches118 May 2026 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Nicolás GONZÁLEZ CASARES SpainS&DSpeeches118 May 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Bert-Jan RUISSEN NetherlandsECRSpeeches118 May 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Ana MIRANDA PAZ SpainGreensSpeeches118 May 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Sebastian TYNKKYNEN FinlandECRSpeeches118 May 2026 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Eric SARGIACOMO FranceS&DSpeeches118 May 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Emma FOURREAU FranceThe LeftSpeeches118 May 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group Abstained
Isabelle LE CALLENNEC FranceEPPSpeeches118 May 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Siegbert Frank DROESE GermanyESNSpeeches118 May 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Lukas SIEPER changed group GermanyRenewSpeeches118 May 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Nora JUNCO GARCÍA changed group SpainECRSpeeches118 May 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Giuseppe LUPO ItalyS&DSpeeches118 May 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Francisco José MILLÁN MON SpainEPPSpeeches118 May 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Victor NEGRESCU RomaniaS&DSpeeches118 May 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Isabella LÖVIN SwedenGreensSpeeches118 May 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group Abstained
Juan Fernando LÓPEZ AGUILAR SpainS&DSpeeches118 May 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For

All votes on this decision, 8

In voting order. Result: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
1Amendment 4 to paragraph 16 A10-0120/2026 – Stéphanie Yon-Courtin – § 16 – Am 4 Roll call197 for, 444 against, 5 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ESN
2Amendment 2 to paragraph 31 A10-0120/2026 – Stéphanie Yon-Courtin – § 31 – Am 2 Roll call185 for, 434 against, 11 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Patriots
3Amendment 5 to paragraph 41 A10-0120/2026 – Stéphanie Yon-Courtin – § 41 – Am 5 Roll call186 for, 441 against, 10 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ESN
Show the other 7 votesShow the other 5 votes
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
2Amendment 2 to paragraph 31 A10-0120/2026 – Stéphanie Yon-Courtin – § 31 – Am 2 Roll call185 for, 434 against, 11 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Patriots
3Amendment 5 to paragraph 41 A10-0120/2026 – Stéphanie Yon-Courtin – § 41 – Am 5 Roll call186 for, 441 against, 10 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ESN
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
4Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 42 A10-0120/2026 – Stéphanie Yon-Courtin – After § 42 – Am 7 Roll call114 for, 447 against, 81 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
5Amendment 6 to paragraph 69 A10-0120/2026 – Stéphanie Yon-Courtin – § 69 – Am 6 Roll call188 for, 449 against, 11 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ESN
6Amendment 1, adding text after recital C A10-0120/2026 – Stéphanie Yon-Courtin – After recital C – Am 1 Roll call198 for, 445 against, 8 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Patriots
7Amendment 3 to recital F A10-0120/2026 – Stéphanie Yon-Courtin – Recital F – Am 3 Roll call198 for, 440 against, 7 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ESN
8Final vote — text as a whole A10-0120/2026 – Stéphanie Yon-Courtin – Motion for a resolution (as a whole) Roll call518 for, 31 against, 102 abstained Adopted

Roll calls requested by The Left, Patriots, ESN.

Text

The text voted on.

Report A-10-2026-0120

AI: What this vote decides Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament adopted a resolution on how the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive affects fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basins.

The text finds uneven implementation, limited benefits for fisheries, and calls for better stakeholder engagement, data, and cross-border cooperation.

MEPs ask the Commission to revise the directive through the forthcoming Ocean Act and to set binding targets.

Read the text · Report a problem

AI: The text in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament's resolution on the impact of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive on fisheries finds uneven implementation and limited benefits for fisheries and aquaculture, and calls for reforms.

Read the text · Report a problem

Dossier

Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.

2024/2126(INI) · Own-initiative report

Parliament adopted the text on 20 May 2026. This is its final position on the matter.

Show the 5 steps of the dossier
  1. Referred to committee · 23 January 2025 (done)
  2. Committee work · Report adopted 15 April 2026 (done)
  3. Tabled for plenary · 23 April 2026 (done)
  4. Plenary vote · Adopted 20 May 2026 (done)
  5. Parliament’s position · Final (done)

Lead committee: PECH · Author: Stéphanie YON-COURTIN (Renew)

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

Show 3 connections: Other decisions of the part-session on PECH dossiers

Other decisions of the part-session on PECH dossiers

See all: Other decisions of the part-session on PECH dossiers

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basins”. Decision, 20 May 2026. votingId 192483, document A-10-2026-0120, reference 2024/2126(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-05-20/9 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 20 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 20 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-20, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-05-20/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-decision-2026-05-20-9,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basins}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-05-20},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-05-20/9}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-05-20/9},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 192483, document A-10-2026-0120, reference 2024/2126(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-20 (CC BY 4.0)}
}