Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 7, after paragraph 42

The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basins

Vote
Amendment 7, after paragraph 42
Result
114 for · 447 against · 81 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
20 May 2026, 13:25
More facts (6)
Position
vote 4 of 8 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
A10-0120/2026 – Stéphanie Yon-Courtin – After § 42 – Am 7
Vote id
192737
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 114 for, 447 against, 81 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 18 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 41Against 1Abst. 0No vote 3 of 45Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
GreensFor 48Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 4Against 110Abst. 7No vote 15 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.86
RenewFor 2Against 68Abst. 1No vote 6 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
EPPFor 1Against 149Abst. 5No vote 28 of 183Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
ECRFor 3Against 72Abst. 0No vote 6 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
PatriotsFor 1Against 17Abst. 61No vote 6 of 85Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.66
ESNFor 1Against 22Abst. 2No vote 2 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.82
No groupFor 13Against 8Abst. 5No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria200
Belgium200
Czechia100
Germany1500
Denmark300
Spain100
Finland200
France400
Croatia100
Italy300
Lithuania100
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Netherlands600
Romania100
Sweden300
Slovenia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 642 members

No vote recorded, 75

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 75 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
18 Jun 2026Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 6 Continued crackdown on civic space and fundamental freedoms in Burkina FasoAmendment99 for, 407 against, 47 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.86 510 voters
23 Jan 2025Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 2 Case of Boualem Sansal in AlgeriaAmendment109 for, 443 against, 61 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.85 546 voters
22 Jan 2026Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 3 Presidential elections in Honduras, the non-recognition of the outcome by the incumbent administration and the attacks on opposition members of the National AssemblyAmendment98 for, 464 against, 46 abstained Rejected For 16 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.85 553 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
22 Oct 2025Amendment 92, adding text after paragraph 43 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sectionsAmendment116 for, 481 against, 53 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.83 582 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 37 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)Amendment107 for, 538 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 16 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.83 596 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 38 to paragraph 56 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)Amendment131 for, 518 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 20 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.83 597 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 28 to paragraph 41 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)Amendment127 for, 484 against, 52 abstained Rejected For 19 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.83 597 voters
19 Sept 2024Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 6 The case of José Daniel Ferrier García in CubaAmendment113 for, 441 against, 56 abstained Rejected For 19 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.83 544 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 82, adding text after recital 1 Business in Europe: Framework for Income Taxation (BEFIT)Amendment94 for, 503 against, 36 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.82 568 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 26 to paragraph 38 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)Amendment100 for, 551 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.82 600 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 8 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 7, after paragraph 42 — The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basins”. Vote, 20 May 2026. votingId 192737, reference 2024/2126(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/192737 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 20 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 20 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-20, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-05-20/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-05-20-192737,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 7, after paragraph 42 — The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basins}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-05-20},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/192737}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/192737},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 192737, reference 2024/2126(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-20 (CC BY 4.0)}
}