Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 4 to paragraph 16

The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basins

Vote
Amendment 4 to paragraph 16
Result
197 for · 444 against · 5 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
20 May 2026, 13:24
More facts (6)
Position
vote 1 of 8 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ESN
Official label
A10-0120/2026 – Stéphanie Yon-Courtin – § 16 – Am 4
Vote id
192734
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 197 for, 444 against, 5 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 30 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 42Abst. 0No vote 3 of 45Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 49Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 122Abst. 0No vote 14 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 72Abst. 0No vote 5 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 1Against 150Abst. 3No vote 29 of 183Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
ECRFor 73Against 3Abst. 0No vote 5 of 81Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
PatriotsFor 79Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 26Against 0Abst. 0No vote 1 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 18Against 6Abst. 2No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

S&D members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria050
Belgium040
Bulgaria020
Cyprus010
Germany0140
Denmark030
Estonia020
Spain0160
Finland020
France0100
Greece030
Croatia030
Hungary020
Ireland010
Italy0200
Lithuania020
Luxembourg010
Latvia010
Malta010
Netherlands040
Poland030
Portugal070
Romania090
Sweden050
Slovenia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 646 members

No vote recorded, 71

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 71 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
10 Jul 2025Amendment 4 to paragraph 8 Future of the EU biotechnology and biomanufacturing sector: leveraging research, boosting innovation and enhancing competitivenessAmendment193 for, 443 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.98 579 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 50 to paragraph 117 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionAmendment198 for, 445 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.98 600 voters
22 Oct 2025Amendment 35, adding text after paragraph 43 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sectionsAmendment194 for, 435 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.97 578 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
10 Mar 2026Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 32 Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment178 for, 435 against, 0 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.97 556 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 27 Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment173 for, 433 against, 0 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.97 548 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 5, adding text after recital E Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment182 for, 422 against, 1 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 551 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 7 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionAmendment200 for, 433 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 597 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 2 to paragraph 1 Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseAmendment192 for, 451 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.97 641 voters
16 Jun 2026Amendment 3, adding text after recital A European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities fundedAmendment202 for, 461 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.97 609 voters
16 Jun 2026Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 20 European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities fundedAmendment202 for, 465 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.97 608 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 8 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 4 to paragraph 16 — The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basins”. Vote, 20 May 2026. votingId 192734, reference 2024/2126(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/192734 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 20 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 20 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-20, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-05-20/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-05-20-192734,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 4 to paragraph 16 — The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basins}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-05-20},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/192734}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/192734},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 192734, reference 2024/2126(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-20 (CC BY 4.0)}
}