Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Final vote

Final vote on the whole text

The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basins

Vote
Final vote on the whole text
Decision
No. 9 of the sitting of 20 May 2026
Result
518 for · 31 against · 102 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
20 May 2026, 13:26
More facts (6)
Effect
Adopted — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 8 of 8 on the decision
Official label
A10-0120/2026 – Stéphanie Yon-Courtin – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Text
Report A-10-2026-0120
Dossier
2024/2126(INI)
Vote id
192483
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 518 for, 31 against, 102 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 80 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Adopted.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 2Against 11Abst. 30No vote 2 of 45Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.55
GreensFor 2Against 1Abst. 46No vote 4 of 53Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.91
S&DFor 99Against 14Abst. 9No vote 14 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.72
RenewFor 68Against 0Abst. 4No vote 5 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.92
EPPFor 156Against 2Abst. 1No vote 24 of 183Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
ECRFor 76Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 81Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 78Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 24Against 0Abst. 2No vote 1 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.88
No groupFor 13Against 3Abst. 10No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria200
Czechia100
Germany1500
France100
Hungary100
Italy100
Lithuania100
Poland002
Slovakia200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 651 members

No vote recorded, 66

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 66 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

The minority on this vote was under 10 % of the votes cast — too small to compare how it split the chamber.

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 8 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/192483
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
29 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Final vote on the whole text — The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basins”. Vote, 20 May 2026. votingId 192483, reference 2024/2126(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/192483 (retrieved 29 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 20 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 20 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-20, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-05-20/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-05-20-192483,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Final vote on the whole text — The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basins}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-05-20},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/192483}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/192483},
  urldate = {2026-09-29},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 192483, reference 2024/2126(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-20 (CC BY 4.0)}
}