Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 7, after paragraph 39

How to secure a sustainable future for the EU livestock sector in light of the need to ensure food security, farmers’ resilience and the challenges posed by animal diseases?

Vote
Amendment 7, after paragraph 39
Decision
No. 7 of the sitting of 30 Apr 2026
Result
195 for · 334 against · 52 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
30 April 2026, 13:22
More facts (6)
Position
vote 14 of 38 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
A10-0088/2026 – Carlo Fidanza – After § 39 – Am 7
Text
Report A-10-2026-0088
Dossier
2025/2053(INI)
Vote id
191961
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 195 for, 334 against, 52 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 34 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 33Against 0Abst. 1No vote 12 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
GreensFor 45Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 32Against 61Abst. 19No vote 23 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.32
RenewFor 14Against 35Abst. 16No vote 12 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.31
EPPFor 2Against 130Abst. 3No vote 50 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
ECRFor 0Against 69Abst. 0No vote 12 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 56Against 11Abst. 4No vote 14 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.68
ESNFor 2Against 20Abst. 2No vote 3 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.75
No groupFor 11Against 8Abst. 7No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria200
Belgium200
Czechia100
Germany1300
Denmark300
Spain300
Finland200
France300
Croatia100
Italy300
Lithuania100
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Netherlands600
Sweden200
Slovenia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 581 members

No vote recorded, 138

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 138 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Amendment 92, adding text after recital 15 Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical productsAmendment202 for, 279 against, 160 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.70 567 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 387 to Article 7, après le paragraph 4 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment207 for, 431 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.69 525 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 104 to Article 2, paragraph 1, point 2, point a, point i Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical productsAmendment219 for, 276 against, 154 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.69 571 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Amendment 95 to Article 2, paragraph 1, point 2, point a Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical productsAmendment209 for, 282 against, 153 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.68 568 voters
23 Jan 2025Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7 Case of Jean-Jacques Wondo in the Democratic Republic of the CongoAmendment150 for, 448 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 25 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.68 498 voters
19 Jun 2025Amendment 286 to Article 4, after paragraph 1 Welfare of dogs and cats and their traceabilityAmendment177 for, 375 against, 28 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.67 489 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 30 to paragraph 8 — part 2 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2024Amendment130 for, 463 against, 77 abstained Rejected For 19 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.67 538 voters
23 Jan 2025Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 2 Case of Boualem Sansal in AlgeriaAmendment109 for, 443 against, 61 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.67 499 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 6, adding text before paragraph 1 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment68 for, 475 against, 110 abstained Rejected For 10 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.67 520 voters
7 Jul 2026Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 46 Competition policy – annual report 2025Amendment139 for, 369 against, 144 abstained Rejected For 21 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.67 537 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 9 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-30/191961
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
27 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 7, after paragraph 39 — How to secure a sustainable future for the EU livestock sector in light of the need to ensure food security, farmers’ resilience and the challenges posed by animal diseases?”. Vote, 30 April 2026. votingId 191961, reference 2025/2053(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-30/191961 (retrieved 27 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 30 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 30 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-30, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-30/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-30-191961,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 7, after paragraph 39 — How to secure a sustainable future for the EU livestock sector in light of the need to ensure food security, farmers’ resilience and the challenges posed by animal diseases?}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-30},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-30/191961}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-30/191961},
  urldate = {2026-09-27},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 191961, reference 2025/2053(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-30 (CC BY 4.0)}
}