Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 68, after paragraph 5

Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025

Vote
Amendment 68, after paragraph 5
Result
178 for · 412 against · 48 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
29 April 2026, 14:33
More facts (6)
Position
vote 7 of 125 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ECR
Official label
A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 5 – Am 68
Vote id
191588
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 178 for, 412 against, 48 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 28 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 44Abst. 0No vote 2 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 43Abst. 2No vote 8 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
S&DFor 0Against 118Abst. 0No vote 17 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 1Against 64Abst. 0No vote 12 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 25Against 132Abst. 2No vote 26 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.75
ECRFor 55Against 0Abst. 24No vote 2 of 81Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.54
PatriotsFor 67Against 0Abst. 7No vote 11 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.86
ESNFor 25Against 0Abst. 2No vote 0 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.89
No groupFor 5Against 11Abst. 11No vote 3 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium020
Cyprus010
Germany030
Denmark010
Spain040
Finland030
France080
Greece040
Ireland030
Italy0100
Netherlands010
Portugal020
Sweden020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 638 members

No vote recorded, 81

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 81 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
26 Mar 2026Amendment 92 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)Amendment220 for, 406 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.90 562 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 59 to paragraph 21 — part 2 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingAmendment189 for, 400 against, 23 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.90 551 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 58, adding text after paragraph 20 — part 1 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingAmendment199 for, 402 against, 20 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.90 560 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
21 May 2026Amendment 29 to paragraph 8 The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forwardAmendment191 for, 371 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.90 519 voters
26 Mar 2026Amendment 91 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)Amendment214 for, 408 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.90 567 voters
18 Dec 2025Amendment 6 to paragraph 61 Decarbonisation and modernisation of EU fisheries, and the development and deployment of fishing gearAmendment204 for, 359 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.90 522 voters
3 Apr 2025Amendment 20, adding text after paragraph 1 Energy-intensive industriesAmendment209 for, 386 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.89 530 voters
10 Sept 2025Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 8 Future of agriculture and the post-2027 common agricultural policyAmendment219 for, 420 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 34 %r · shared0.89 577 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 49 + 61 (voted as one) to Article 1 Framework for achieving climate neutralityAmendment221 for, 407 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by ECR, Greens, S&D, Renewr · shared0.89 574 voters
18 Jun 2026Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 4 — part 1 Deteriorating situation of political prisoners in Belarus, in particular the case of Aliaksandra PulinovichAmendment177 for, 369 against, 17 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.89 506 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 68, after paragraph 5 — Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025”. Vote, 29 April 2026. votingId 191588, reference 2025/2135(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191588 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-29/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-29-191588,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 68, after paragraph 5 — Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-29},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191588}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191588},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 191588, reference 2025/2135(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29 (CC BY 4.0)}
}