Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Separate vote: paragraph 101

The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report

Vote
Separate vote: paragraph 101
Decision
No. 25 of the sitting of 29 Apr 2026
Result
365 for · 168 against · 78 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
29 April 2026, 14:55
More facts (6)
Position
vote 16 of 32 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: EPP
Official label
A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 101
Text
Report A-10-2026-0091
Dossier
2025/2239(INI)
Vote id
191417
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 365 for, 168 against, 78 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 60 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 43Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 44Against 0Abst. 0No vote 9 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 109Against 2Abst. 0No vote 24 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
RenewFor 61Against 0Abst. 0No vote 16 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 96Against 17Abst. 36No vote 36 of 185Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.47
ECRFor 3Against 73Abst. 2No vote 3 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.90
PatriotsFor 0Against 40Abst. 34No vote 11 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.31
ESNFor 0Against 26Abst. 1No vote 0 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 9Against 10Abst. 5No vote 6 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria030
Czechia010
Germany0150
France001
Hungary010
Italy010
Lithuania010
Poland020
Slovakia020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 611 members

No vote recorded, 108

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 108 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point q — part 1 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote373 for, 139 against, 53 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.90 493 voters
12 Feb 2026Final vote — text as a whole Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenFinal340 for, 141 against, 68 abstained Adopted For 62 %r · shared0.89 483 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point r — part 2 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote343 for, 146 against, 68 abstained Adopted For 62 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.89 486 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Jun 2025Amendment 29 — part 4 Combating the sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children and child sexual abuse material and replacing Council Framework Decision 2004/68/JHA (recast)Amendment435 for, 153 against, 60 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.88 563 voters
12 Feb 2026Recital M — part 4 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote341 for, 136 against, 58 abstained Adopted For 64 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.88 471 voters
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 57 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Separate vote405 for, 176 against, 49 abstained Adopted For 64 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.88 599 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point u — part 4 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote351 for, 141 against, 68 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.88 490 voters
13 Nov 2025Recital D — part 1 Gender Equality Strategy 2025Split vote404 for, 176 against, 22 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.87 526 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point v — part 2 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote354 for, 143 against, 52 abstained Adopted For 64 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.87 480 voters
20 May 2026Separate vote on citation 25 Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseSeparate vote451 for, 145 against, 52 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.87 563 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191417
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Separate vote: paragraph 101 — The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report”. Vote, 29 April 2026. votingId 191417, reference 2025/2239(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191417 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-29/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-29-191417,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Separate vote: paragraph 101 — The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-29},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191417}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191417},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 191417, reference 2025/2239(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29 (CC BY 4.0)}
}