Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendments 114 + 100 (voted as one), after recital 22

Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical products

Vote
Amendments 114 + 100 (voted as one), after recital 22
Result
230 for · 304 against · 113 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
29 April 2026, 14:20
More facts (6)
Position
vote 34 of 37 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
A10-0104/2026 – Dimitris Tsiodras, Piotr Müller – After recital 22 – Am 114= 100=
Vote id
191255
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 230 for, 304 against, 113 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 36 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 43Against 1Abst. 0No vote 2 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
GreensFor 45Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 61Against 4Abst. 58No vote 12 of 135Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.24
RenewFor 25Against 6Abst. 34No vote 12 of 77Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.28
EPPFor 21Against 139Abst. 2No vote 23 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.79
ECRFor 5Against 75Abst. 1No vote 0 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.89
PatriotsFor 9Against 49Abst. 15No vote 12 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.51
ESNFor 2Against 23Abst. 2No vote 0 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.78
No groupFor 19Against 7Abst. 1No vote 3 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ECR members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium030
Bulgaria010
Cyprus010
Czechia030
Denmark010
Estonia010
Spain020
Finland010
France040
Greece020
Croatia010
Italy0240
Lithuania020
Latvia030
Netherlands120
Poland0200
Romania411
Sweden030

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 647 members

No vote recorded, 72

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 72 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
22 May 2025Separate vote on paragraph 2 Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2023Separate vote266 for, 304 against, 22 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.77 530 voters
2 Apr 2025Paragraph 28 — part 3 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2024Split vote308 for, 332 against, 35 abstained Rejected For 46 %r · shared0.76 601 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment257 for, 331 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.76 536 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Dec 2025Annex, paragraph 1 — part 2 Digitalisation, artificial intelligence and algorithmic management in the workplace – shaping the future of workSplit vote278 for, 374 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 42 %r · shared0.75 596 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point g — part 2 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote255 for, 290 against, 20 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.75 520 voters
29 Apr 2026Paragraph 48 — part 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote281 for, 350 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by Greens, EPPr · shared0.75 632 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 4 — part 2 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategySplit vote274 for, 298 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 47 %Requested by The Left, S&Dr · shared0.75 532 voters
17 Jun 2025Final vote — text as a whole Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in SevilleFinal282 for, 340 against, 26 abstained Rejected For 44 %r · shared0.75 584 voters
17 Jun 2025Separate vote on paragraph 55 Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in SevilleSeparate vote289 for, 347 against, 25 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.75 596 voters
12 Feb 2026Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 46 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategyAmendment251 for, 309 against, 20 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.74 530 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendments 114 + 100 (voted as one), after recital 22 — Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical products”. Vote, 29 April 2026. votingId 191255, reference 2025/0531(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191255 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-29/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-29-191255,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendments 114 + 100 (voted as one), after recital 22 — Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical products}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-29},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191255}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191255},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 191255, reference 2025/0531(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29 (CC BY 4.0)}
}