Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 91, after recital 15

Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical products

Vote
Amendment 91, after recital 15
Result
151 for · 415 against · 69 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
29 April 2026, 14:19
More facts (6)
Position
vote 27 of 37 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
A10-0104/2026 – Dimitris Tsiodras, Piotr Müller – After recital 15 – Am 91
Vote id
191252
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 151 for, 415 against, 69 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 24 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 43Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 42Against 2Abst. 0No vote 9 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
S&DFor 15Against 102Abst. 0No vote 18 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.81
RenewFor 3Against 63Abst. 0No vote 11 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
EPPFor 7Against 153Abst. 0No vote 25 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
ECRFor 10Against 69Abst. 0No vote 2 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.81
PatriotsFor 12Against 0Abst. 62No vote 11 of 85Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.76
ESNFor 2Against 22Abst. 2No vote 1 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.77
No groupFor 17Against 4Abst. 5No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria010
Czechia111
Germany602
France010
Greece400
Luxembourg010
Poland001
Romania101
Slovakia500

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 635 members

No vote recorded, 84

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 84 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 May 2025Amendment 3, adding text after recital 9 The role of gas storage for securing gas supplies ahead of the winter seasonAmendment102 for, 427 against, 45 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.76 503 voters
23 Jan 2025Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 2 Case of Boualem Sansal in AlgeriaAmendment109 for, 443 against, 61 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.76 544 voters
3 Apr 2025Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 19 Estimates of revenue and expenditure for the financial year 2026 – Section I – European ParliamentAmendment143 for, 366 against, 107 abstained Rejected For 23 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.74 535 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
22 Oct 2025Amendment 92, adding text after paragraph 43 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sectionsAmendment116 for, 481 against, 53 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.73 576 voters
22 Oct 2025Amendment 46, adding text before paragraph 1 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sectionsAmendment106 for, 503 against, 39 abstained Rejected For 16 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.73 576 voters
19 Sept 2024Amendment 1, adding text after recital D The case of José Daniel Ferrier García in CubaAmendment112 for, 485 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.72 541 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 29 to paragraph 44 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)Amendment148 for, 500 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 22 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.72 590 voters
23 Jan 2025Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7 Case of Jean-Jacques Wondo in the Democratic Republic of the CongoAmendment150 for, 448 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 25 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.71 543 voters
9 Oct 2025Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 4 Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2024Amendment104 for, 495 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 17 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.71 545 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 37 to paragraph 91 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034Amendment73 for, 492 against, 91 abstained Rejected For 11 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.71 616 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 91, after recital 15 — Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical products”. Vote, 29 April 2026. votingId 191252, reference 2025/0531(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191252 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-29/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-29-191252,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 91, after recital 15 — Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical products}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-29},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191252}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191252},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 191252, reference 2025/0531(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29 (CC BY 4.0)}
}