Vote · Roll call

Amendment 97 to article 2, paragraph 1, point 2, point b

Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical products

Vote: Amendment 97 to article 2, paragraph 1, point 2, point b
Decision: No. 1 of the sitting of 29 Apr 2026
Result: 123 for · 506 against · 17 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date: 29 April 2026, 14:18

More facts (6)

Position: vote 23 of 37 on the decision
Requested by: roll call: The Left
Official label: A10-0104/2026 – Dimitris Tsiodras, Piotr Müller – Article 2, § 1, point 2, point b – Am 97
Text: Report A-10-2026-0104
Dossier: 2025/0531(COD)
Vote id: 191249

Position: vote 23 of 37 on the decision
Requested by: roll call: The Left
Official label: A10-0104/2026 – Dimitris Tsiodras, Piotr Müller – Article 2, § 1, point 2, point b – Am 97
Text: Report A-10-2026-0104
Dossier: 2025/0531(COD)
Vote id: 191249

Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP)

Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Rejected · 19 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. **No vote**: in office that day, no position recorded. **Majority line**: the most common position. **Clear line**: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. **Cohesion**: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
Group	For	Against	Abst.	No vote	Majority line	Clear line	Cohesion
The Left	For 44	Against 0	Abst. 0	No vote 2 of 46	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 1.00
Greens	For 44	Against 0	Abst. 1	No vote 8 of 53	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 0.97
S&D	For 11	Against 109	Abst. 1	No vote 14 of 135	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.85
Renew	For 0	Against 64	Abst. 1	No vote 12 of 77	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.98
EPP	For 3	Against 161	Abst. 0	No vote 21 of 185	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.97
ECR	For 2	Against 78	Abst. 0	No vote 1 of 81	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.96
Patriots	For 0	Against 65	Abst. 9	No vote 11 of 85	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.82
ESN	For 2	Against 24	Abst. 1	No vote 0 of 27	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.83
No group	For 17	Against 5	Abst. 4	No vote 4 of 30	Majority line —	Clear line No line	Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Each cell: members of that country in that group who voted for – against – abstained (group at the date of the vote). Shading: the share of the cell's votes that were for; the stronger the shading, the more for (scale below). — : no member voted.
Country	The Left	Greens	S&D	Renew	EPP	ECR	Patriots	ESN	No group
Austria	no member voted	2–0–0	5–0–0	0–1–0	0–5–0	no member voted	0–0–6	no member voted	no member voted
Belgium	2–0–0	2–0–0	2–2–0	0–5–0	0–3–0	0–3–0	0–3–0	no member voted	no member voted
Bulgaria	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0	0–3–0	0–5–0	0–1–0	no member voted	0–3–0	0–1–0
Cyprus	1–0–0	no member voted	0–1–0	no member voted	0–2–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Czechia	no member voted	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–5–0	0–3–0	0–7–0	0–1–0	0–1–2
Germany	3–0–0	12–0–1	0–13–0	0–7–0	1–27–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–15–0	7–0–1
Denmark	1–0–0	3–0–0	0–3–0	0–4–0	0–2–0	0–1–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted
Estonia	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0	0–2–0	0–2–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Spain	4–0–0	3–0–0	0–19–0	0–1–0	0–18–0	0–2–0	0–5–0	no member voted	no member voted
Finland	3–0–0	2–0–0	0–2–0	0–2–0	1–3–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
France	8–0–0	3–0–0	0–12–0	0–12–0	0–5–0	0–4–0	0–27–0	0–1–0	0–1–0
Greece	4–0–0	no member voted	0–3–0	no member voted	0–6–0	0–2–0	0–1–0	no member voted	4–0–0
Croatia	no member voted	1–0–0	0–3–0	no member voted	0–4–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Hungary	no member voted	no member voted	2–0–0	no member voted	0–4–0	no member voted	0–7–0	0–0–1	no member voted
Ireland	3–0–0	no member voted	0–1–0	0–5–1	0–4–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Italy	10–0–0	3–0–0	1–15–0	0–1–0	0–7–0	0–24–0	0–5–0	0–1–0	no member voted
Lithuania	no member voted	1–0–0	0–2–0	0–2–0	0–3–0	0–2–0	no member voted	0–1–0	no member voted
Luxembourg	no member voted	1–0–0	0–1–0	0–1–0	0–2–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	0–1–0
Latvia	no member voted	1–0–0	0–1–0	no member voted	0–2–0	0–3–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted
Malta	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Netherlands	1–0–0	6–0–0	0–3–0	0–5–0	0–4–0	0–3–0	0–6–0	no member voted	no member voted
Poland	no member voted	no member voted	0–3–0	0–1–0	0–22–0	0–19–0	0–0–3	0–2–0	0–0–1
Portugal	2–0–0	no member voted	1–7–0	0–2–0	0–7–0	no member voted	0–2–0	no member voted	no member voted
Romania	no member voted	no member voted	0–8–1	0–2–0	1–7–0	2–4–0	no member voted	no member voted	1–1–0
Sweden	2–0–0	2–0–0	0–5–0	0–1–0	0–5–0	0–3–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Slovenia	no member voted	1–0–0	0–1–0	0–2–0	0–5–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Slovakia	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	0–5–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	2–0–0	5–0–0

Share for: 0–19 %20–39 %40–59 %60–79 %80–100 %

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
Country	For	Against
Austria	0	5
Belgium	0	3
Bulgaria	0	5
Cyprus	0	2
Czechia	0	5
Germany	1	27
Denmark	0	2
Estonia	0	2
Spain	0	18
Finland	1	3
France	0	5
Greece	0	6
Croatia	0	4
Hungary	0	4
Ireland	0	4
Italy	0	7
Lithuania	0	3
Luxembourg	0	2
Latvia	0	2
Malta	0	1
Netherlands	0	4
Poland	0	22
Portugal	0	7
Romania	1	7
Sweden	0	5
Slovenia	0	5
Slovakia	0	1

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 646 members

No vote recorded, 73

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 73 members

Name · group that day · country

Abir AL-SAHLANI group that day: Renew · Sweden
Aldo PATRICIELLO group that day: Patriots · Italy
Alex AGIUS SALIBA group that day: S&D · Malta
Alexandra GEESE group that day: Greens · Germany
Alma EZCURRA ALMANSA group that day: EPP · Spain
Alvise PÉREZ group that day: No group · Spain
András GYÜRK group that day: Patriots · Hungary
Andreas GLÜCK group that day: Renew · Germany
Angelika NIEBLER group that day: EPP · Germany
Anna STÜRGKH group that day: Renew · Austria
Annalisa CORRADO group that day: S&D · Italy
Arash SAEIDI group that day: The Left · France
Aurore LALUCQ group that day: S&D · France
Axel VOSS group that day: EPP · Germany
Bart GROOTHUIS group that day: Renew · Netherlands
Carmen CRESPO DÍAZ group that day: EPP · Spain
Caterina CHINNICI group that day: EPP · Italy
Claudiu MANDA group that day: S&D · Romania
Dan-Ştefan MOTREANU group that day: EPP · Romania
Daniel ATTARD group that day: S&D · Malta
Dario NARDELLA group that day: S&D · Italy
Davor Ivo STIER group that day: EPP · Croatia
Dennis RADTKE group that day: EPP · Germany
Elena YONCHEVA group that day: No group · Bulgaria
Elissavet VOZEMBERG-VRIONIDI group that day: EPP · Greece
Emma WIESNER group that day: Renew · Sweden
Enikő GYŐRI group that day: Patriots · Hungary
Ernő SCHALLER-BAROSS group that day: Patriots · Hungary
Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA group that day: EPP · Spain
Eszter LAKOS group that day: EPP · Hungary
Eugen TOMAC group that day: Renew · Romania
Eva MAYDELL group that day: EPP · Bulgaria
Fidias PANAYIOTOU group that day: No group · Cyprus
Fulvio MARTUSCIELLO group that day: EPP · Italy
Gheorghe CÂRCIU group that day: S&D · Romania
Grégory ALLIONE group that day: Renew · France
Hermann TERTSCH group that day: Patriots · Spain
Ignazio Roberto MARINO group that day: Greens · Italy
Isabella LÖVIN group that day: Greens · Sweden
Ivars IJABS group that day: Renew · Latvia
Jana NAGYOVÁ group that day: Patriots · Czechia
Jaume ASENS LLODRÀ group that day: Greens · Spain
Jeannette BALJEU group that day: Renew · Netherlands
Jens GEIER group that day: S&D · Germany
Kai TEGETHOFF group that day: Greens · Germany
Katri KULMUNI group that day: Renew · Finland
Laura BALLARÍN CEREZA group that day: S&D · Spain
Ľubica KARVAŠOVÁ group that day: Renew · Slovakia
Ľuboš BLAHA group that day: No group · Slovakia
Majdouline SBAI group that day: Greens · France
Marco TARQUINIO group that day: S&D · Italy
Martin GÜNTHER group that day: The Left · Germany
Matthieu VALET group that day: Patriots · France
Mélanie DISDIER group that day: Patriots · France
Mircea-Gheorghe HAVA group that day: EPP · Romania
Mirosława NYKIEL group that day: EPP · Poland
Mohammed CHAHIM group that day: S&D · Netherlands
Moritz KÖRNER group that day: Renew · Germany
Mounir SATOURI group that day: Greens · France
Nicolae ȘTEFĂNUȚĂ group that day: Greens · Romania
Nikolina BRNJAC group that day: EPP · Croatia
Patryk JAKI group that day: ECR · Poland
Peter AGIUS group that day: EPP · Malta
Péter MAGYAR group that day: EPP · Hungary
Philippe OLIVIER group that day: Patriots · France
Raffaele STANCANELLI group that day: Patriots · Italy
Roberta METSOLA group that day: EPP · Malta
Romana JERKOVIĆ group that day: S&D · Croatia
Sandro RUOTOLO group that day: S&D · Italy
Susana SOLÍS PÉREZ group that day: EPP · Spain
Tamás DEUTSCH group that day: Patriots · Hungary
Thomas BAJADA group that day: S&D · Malta
Zoltán TARR group that day: EPP · Hungary

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

**Result**: for–against–abstained. **For**: share of the votes cast. **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call.
Date	Vote	Kind	Result	For	Requested by	r · shared
19 Sept 2024	Amendment 1, adding text after recital D The case of José Daniel Ferrier García in Cuba	Amendment	112 for, 485 against, 13 abstained Rejected	For 18 %	Requested by The Left	r · shared0.88 549 voters
9 Oct 2025	Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 4 Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2024	Amendment	104 for, 495 against, 16 abstained Rejected	For 17 %	Requested by Greens	r · shared0.87 553 voters
9 Oct 2025	Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 8 Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2024	Amendment	101 for, 501 against, 9 abstained Rejected	For 17 %	Requested by Greens	r · shared0.87 549 voters

Show 7 more

**Result**: for–against–abstained. **For**: share of the votes cast. **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call.
Date	Vote	Kind	Result	For	Requested by	r · shared
22 Oct 2025	Amendment 45, adding text before paragraph 1 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections	Amendment	111 for, 511 against, 15 abstained Rejected	For 17 %	Requested by The Left	r · shared0.86 576 voters
22 Oct 2025	Amendment 89 to paragraph 37 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections	Amendment	122 for, 516 against, 18 abstained Rejected	For 19 %	Requested by The Left	r · shared0.86 592 voters
8 Jul 2026	Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 37 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)	Amendment	107 for, 538 against, 16 abstained Rejected	For 16 %	Requested by The Left	r · shared0.86 598 voters
8 Jul 2026	Amendment 26 to paragraph 38 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)	Amendment	100 for, 551 against, 15 abstained Rejected	For 15 %	Requested by The Left	r · shared0.86 603 voters
8 Jul 2026	Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 5 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)	Amendment	108 for, 548 against, 9 abstained Rejected	For 16 %	Requested by The Left	r · shared0.85 602 voters
30 Apr 2026	Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 5 Escalating trafficking and exploitation by criminal groups in Haiti	Amendment	84 for, 464 against, 11 abstained Rejected	For 15 %	Requested by The Left	r · shared0.85 548 voters
10 Mar 2026	Amendment 87 to paragraph 52 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing	Amendment	106 for, 489 against, 18 abstained Rejected	For 17 %	Requested by Greens	r · shared0.85 562 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Decision Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical products New EU law · report by Dimitris Tsiodras, Piotr Müller 29 Apr 2026 Passed

Other votes on this decision

Vote Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical products — Proposal to reject the text Roll-call vote · 29 Apr 2026 29 Apr 2026
Vote Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical products — Amendment 116 to Article 2, before paragraph 1 Roll-call vote · 29 Apr 2026 29 Apr 2026
Vote Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical products — Amendment 117 to Article 2, paragraph 1, point 2, point a, point i Roll-call vote · 29 Apr 2026 29 Apr 2026
Vote Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical products — Amendment 104 to Article 2, paragraph 1, point 2, point a, point i Roll-call vote · 29 Apr 2026 29 Apr 2026
Vote Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical products — Amendment 95 to Article 2, paragraph 1, point 2, point a Roll-call vote · 29 Apr 2026 29 Apr 2026
Vote Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical products — Amendment 96 to Article 2, paragraph 1, point 2, point b Roll-call vote · 29 Apr 2026 29 Apr 2026
Vote Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical products — Amendment 105 to Article 2, paragraph 1, point 2, point b Roll-call vote · 29 Apr 2026 29 Apr 2026
Vote Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical products — Amendment 101 to Article 2, paragraph 1, after point 2 Roll-call vote · 29 Apr 2026 29 Apr 2026
Vote Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical products — Amendment 98, adding text after recital 2 Roll-call vote · 29 Apr 2026 29 Apr 2026
Vote Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical products — Amendment 91, adding text after recital 15 Roll-call vote · 29 Apr 2026 29 Apr 2026

See all

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191249
Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament)
Results of votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament)
Data source: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 97 to article 2, paragraph 1, point 2, point b — Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical products”. Vote, 29 April 2026. votingId 191249, reference 2025/0531(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191249 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-29/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).

BibTeX

@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-29-191249,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 97 to article 2, paragraph 1, point 2, point b — Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical products}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-29},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191249}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191249},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 191249, reference 2025/0531(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29 (CC BY 4.0)}
}