Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 6 to paragraph 60

Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section III

Vote
Amendment 6 to paragraph 60
Result
349 for · 264 against · 43 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
28 April 2026, 13:50
More facts (6)
Position
vote 86 of 88 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: EPP
Official label
A10-0044/2026 – Nils Ušakovs – § 60 – Am 6
Vote id
191237
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 349 for, 264 against, 43 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 53 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 40Abst. 1No vote 5 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
GreensFor 2Against 44Abst. 0No vote 7 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
S&DFor 5Against 121Abst. 0No vote 9 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
RenewFor 14Against 56Abst. 0No vote 7 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.70
EPPFor 162Against 3Abst. 2No vote 18 of 185Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
ECRFor 74Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 81Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 46Against 0Abst. 31No vote 8 of 85Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.40
ESNFor 27Against 0Abst. 0No vote 0 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 19Against 0Abst. 9No vote 2 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ECR members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium300
Bulgaria100
Cyprus100
Czechia300
Denmark100
Estonia100
Spain200
France400
Greece200
Croatia100
Italy1900
Lithuania200
Latvia300
Netherlands300
Poland1900
Romania600
Sweden300

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 656 members

No vote recorded, 63

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 63 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 10 — part 3 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersSplit vote353 for, 240 against, 5 abstained Adopted For 59 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.92 550 voters
15 Dec 2025Monday’s agenda — Request by the PfE Group (epizootic) Final vote Monday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group (epizootic)Other240 for, 194 against, 2 abstained Adopted For 55 %r · shared0.90 401 voters
17 Sept 2026Recital F — part 2 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersSplit vote338 for, 233 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 58 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.90 532 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Sept 2026Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 1 — part 2 Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officersAmendment344 for, 256 against, 8 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.88 559 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 13 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment330 for, 250 against, 16 abstained Adopted For 55 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.88 549 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 1 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment304 for, 268 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 51 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.88 544 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 74, adding text after paragraph 5 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment338 for, 261 against, 8 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.88 558 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 72, adding text after recital B The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment345 for, 242 against, 5 abstained Adopted For 58 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.88 544 voters
20 Jan 2026Amendment 8 to paragraph 7a Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug traffickingAmendment347 for, 277 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 55 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.88 583 voters
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 10 — part 2 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersSplit vote363 for, 231 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 60 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.87 553 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
27 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 6 to paragraph 60 — Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section III”. Vote, 28 April 2026. votingId 191237, reference 2025/2246(BUI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/191237 (retrieved 27 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-28, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-28/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-28-191237,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 6 to paragraph 60 — Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section III}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-28},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/191237}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/191237},
  urldate = {2026-09-27},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 191237, reference 2025/2246(BUI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-28 (CC BY 4.0)}
}