Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 24 to paragraph 22

European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2026

Vote
Amendment 24 to paragraph 22
Result
187 for · 430 against · 8 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
11 March 2026, 13:05
More facts (6)
Position
vote 24 of 32 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots
Official label
A10-0033/2026 – Nela Riehl – § 22 – Am 24
Vote id
188624
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 187 for, 430 against, 8 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 30 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 2Against 35Abst. 3No vote 6 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.81
GreensFor 2Against 43Abst. 0No vote 8 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
S&DFor 0Against 118Abst. 0No vote 17 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 3Against 65Abst. 0No vote 8 of 76Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
EPPFor 3Against 160Abst. 1No vote 20 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
ECRFor 72Against 2Abst. 2No vote 5 of 81Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.92
PatriotsFor 61Against 1Abst. 0No vote 22 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
ESNFor 25Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 28Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 19Against 6Abst. 2No vote 4 of 31Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria020
Belgium020
Czechia100
Germany1110
Denmark030
Spain030
Finland020
France030
Croatia010
Italy030
Lithuania010
Luxembourg010
Latvia010
Netherlands060
Romania010
Sweden030

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 625 members

No vote recorded, 93

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 93 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 12 Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Amendment193 for, 428 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.95 552 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 3 to paragraph 77 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAmendment196 for, 422 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.95 551 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 21, adding text after paragraph 237 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionAmendment200 for, 440 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 573 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
10 Mar 2026Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 37 Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment176 for, 431 against, 1 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.95 575 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 22 Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Amendment195 for, 420 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.94 550 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 7 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionAmendment200 for, 433 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 573 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 34 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAmendment201 for, 420 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.94 556 voters
16 Jun 2026Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 20 European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities fundedAmendment202 for, 463 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.94 586 voters
11 Mar 2026Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 24 European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026Amendment184 for, 441 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 616 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 27, adding text after paragraph 19 Discharge 2024: AgenciesAmendment200 for, 432 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.94 564 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 24 to paragraph 22 — European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2026”. Vote, 11 March 2026. votingId 188624, reference 2025/2183(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-11/188624 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 11 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 11 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-11, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-11/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-03-11-188624,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 24 to paragraph 22 — European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2026}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-11},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-11/188624}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-11/188624},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 188624, reference 2025/2183(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-11 (CC BY 4.0)}
}