Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 17 — part 2

European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2026

Vote
Paragraph 17 — part 2
Result
287 for · 278 against · 49 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
11 March 2026, 13:04
More facts (6)
Position
vote 18 of 32 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D · split vote: EPP
Official label
A10-0033/2026 – Nela Riehl – § 17/2
Vote id
188619
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 287 for, 278 against, 49 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 47 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “the prevention and reduction of homelessness and building retrofits”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 43Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 47Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 117Against 0Abst. 0No vote 18 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 53Against 11Abst. 4No vote 8 of 76Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.67
EPPFor 6Against 144Abst. 8No vote 26 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.87
ECRFor 2Against 67Abst. 3No vote 9 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.90
PatriotsFor 0Against 33Abst. 27No vote 24 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.33
ESNFor 1Against 18Abst. 4No vote 5 of 28Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.67
No groupFor 18Against 5Abst. 3No vote 5 of 31Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria100
Czechia110
Germany801
France010
Greece202
Luxembourg010
Poland010
Romania010
Slovakia600

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 614 members

No vote recorded, 104

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 104 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Feb 2026Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 63 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategyAmendment261 for, 266 against, 51 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.91 506 voters
17 Jun 2025Separate vote on paragraph 42 Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in SevilleSeparate vote290 for, 357 against, 17 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by S&D, Renewr · shared0.91 567 voters
12 Feb 2026Amendment 10, adding text after recital AG Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategyAmendment265 for, 273 against, 42 abstained Rejected For 46 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.90 508 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Jun 2025Separate vote on paragraph 69 Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in SevilleSeparate vote291 for, 356 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.90 566 voters
12 Feb 2026Separate vote on paragraph 65 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategySeparate vote253 for, 320 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.90 509 voters
17 Dec 2025Annex, paragraph 1 — part 2 Digitalisation, artificial intelligence and algorithmic management in the workplace – shaping the future of workSplit vote278 for, 374 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 42 %r · shared0.90 571 voters
12 Feb 2026Separate vote on paragraph 64 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategySeparate vote253 for, 317 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.90 508 voters
12 Mar 2025Paragraph 31 — part 3 European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2025Split vote311 for, 367 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 46 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.90 574 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment257 for, 331 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.89 514 voters
17 Jun 2025Separate vote on paragraph 44 Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in SevilleSeparate vote280 for, 322 against, 62 abstained Rejected For 42 %Requested by S&D, Renewr · shared0.89 566 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 17 — part 2 — European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2026”. Vote, 11 March 2026. votingId 188619, reference 2025/2183(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-11/188619 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 11 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 11 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-11, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-11/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-03-11-188619,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 17 — part 2 — European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2026}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-11},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-11/188619}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-11/188619},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 188619, reference 2025/2183(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-11 (CC BY 4.0)}
}