Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 17 — part 1

European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2026

Vote
Paragraph 17 — part 1
Result
434 for · 173 against · 24 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
11 March 2026, 13:04
More facts (6)
Position
vote 17 of 32 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D · split vote: EPP
Official label
A10-0033/2026 – Nela Riehl – § 17/1
Vote id
188618
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 434 for, 173 against, 24 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 69 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘the prevention and reduction of homelessness and building retrofits’ and ‘and stresses the importance of monitoring its use during this cycle of the European Semester; calls for measures to combat speculation and regulate short-term rentals in areas under housing stress;’”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 41Against 0Abst. 1No vote 4 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
GreensFor 46Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 120Against 0Abst. 0No vote 15 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 50Against 16Abst. 3No vote 7 of 76Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.59
EPPFor 159Against 2Abst. 4No vote 19 of 184Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.95
ECRFor 0Against 72Abst. 3No vote 6 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
PatriotsFor 0Against 52Abst. 11No vote 21 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.74
ESNFor 1Against 22Abst. 2No vote 3 of 28Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.82
No groupFor 17Against 9Abst. 0No vote 5 of 31Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

S&D members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria500
Belgium400
Bulgaria200
Cyprus100
Germany1400
Denmark300
Estonia200
Spain1400
Finland200
France1000
Greece300
Croatia400
Hungary200
Italy1900
Lithuania200
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Malta300
Netherlands400
Poland300
Portugal700
Romania900
Sweden400
Slovenia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 631 members

No vote recorded, 87

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 87 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Oct 2025Paragraph 4 — part 2 Second World Summit for Social DevelopmentSplit vote415 for, 177 against, 19 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.93 541 voters
21 May 2026Paragraph 18 — part 2 The need to reduce work-related fatalitiesSplit vote303 for, 165 against, 5 abstained Adopted For 64 %Requested by The Left, Patriotsr · shared0.92 421 voters
9 Jul 2025Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 92 Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political ForumAmendment465 for, 176 against, 44 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.90 599 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
10 Mar 2026Recital N — part 2 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingSplit vote443 for, 161 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.89 601 voters
29 Apr 2026Recital BB — part 1 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote439 for, 168 against, 16 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.89 555 voters
12 Mar 2025Paragraph 31 — part 6 European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2025Split vote444 for, 204 against, 11 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.89 570 voters
19 Jun 2025Recital R — part 2 Electricity grids: the backbone of the EU energy systemSplit vote405 for, 166 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.88 505 voters
29 Apr 2026Recital AP — part 1 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote424 for, 188 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.88 557 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point r — part 1 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote386 for, 165 against, 17 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.88 516 voters
23 Oct 2024Final vote Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member StatesFinal444 for, 179 against, 20 abstained Adopted For 69 %r · shared0.88 557 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 17 — part 1 — European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2026”. Vote, 11 March 2026. votingId 188618, reference 2025/2183(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-11/188618 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 11 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 11 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-11, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-11/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-03-11-188618,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 17 — part 1 — European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2026}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-11},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-11/188618}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-11/188618},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 188618, reference 2025/2183(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-11 (CC BY 4.0)}
}