Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Final vote

Final vote on the whole text

European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2026

Vote
Final vote on the whole text
Decision
No. 8 of the sitting of 11 Mar 2026
Result
404 for · 208 against · 20 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
11 March 2026, 13:06
More facts (6)
Effect
Adopted — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 32 of 32 on the decision
Official label
A10-0033/2026 – Nela Riehl – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Text
Report A-10-2026-0033
Dossier
2025/2183(INI)
Vote id
186089
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 404 for, 208 against, 20 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 64 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Adopted.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 32Against 7Abst. 4No vote 3 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.62
GreensFor 46Against 1Abst. 0No vote 6 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 120Against 0Abst. 0No vote 15 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 50Against 15Abst. 4No vote 7 of 76Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.59
EPPFor 145Against 9Abst. 8No vote 22 of 184Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.84
ECRFor 0Against 77Abst. 0No vote 4 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 0Against 62Abst. 0No vote 22 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 23Abst. 2No vote 3 of 28Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
No groupFor 11Against 14Abst. 2No vote 4 of 31Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

S&D members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria500
Belgium400
Bulgaria200
Cyprus100
Germany1400
Denmark300
Estonia200
Spain1400
Finland200
France900
Greece300
Croatia400
Hungary200
Italy1900
Lithuania200
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Malta300
Netherlands400
Poland300
Portugal800
Romania900
Sweden400
Slovenia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 632 members

No vote recorded, 86

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 86 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
18 Jun 2025Recital G — part 2 Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience FacilitySplit vote418 for, 200 against, 35 abstained Adopted For 64 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.90 573 voters
18 Jun 2025Recital E — part 2 Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience FacilitySplit vote420 for, 224 against, 13 abstained Adopted For 64 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.90 578 voters
20 Jan 2026Final vote — text as a whole Just transition directive in the world of work: ensuring the creation of jobs and revitalising local economiesFinal420 for, 207 against, 20 abstained Adopted For 65 %r · shared0.90 583 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
21 May 2026Paragraph 18 — part 2 The need to reduce work-related fatalitiesSplit vote303 for, 165 against, 5 abstained Adopted For 64 %Requested by The Left, Patriotsr · shared0.89 424 voters
23 Oct 2024Final vote Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member StatesFinal444 for, 179 against, 20 abstained Adopted For 69 %r · shared0.88 558 voters
18 Jun 2025Paragraph 19 — part 3 Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience FacilitySplit vote404 for, 235 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 62 %r · shared0.87 568 voters
18 Jun 2025Paragraph 19 — part 2 Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience FacilitySplit vote430 for, 218 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 66 %r · shared0.87 574 voters
11 Mar 2026Paragraph 24 — part 2 European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026Split vote444 for, 176 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.86 624 voters
7 May 2025Paragraph 51 — part 2 2023 and 2024 reports on TürkiyeSplit vote426 for, 192 against, 4 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.86 541 voters
23 Oct 2024Amendment 10 — part 1 Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member StatesAmendment418 for, 180 against, 31 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.86 545 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-11/186089
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Final vote on the whole text — European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2026”. Vote, 11 March 2026. votingId 186089, reference 2025/2183(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-11/186089 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 11 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 11 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-11, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-11/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-03-11-186089,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Final vote on the whole text — European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2026}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-11},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-11/186089}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-11/186089},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 186089, reference 2025/2183(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-11 (CC BY 4.0)}
}