Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 18 — part 1

Fisheries management approaches for safeguarding sensitive species, tackling invasive species and benefiting local economies

Vote
Paragraph 18 — part 1
Decision
No. 9 of the sitting of 10 Mar 2026
Result
444 for · 153 against · 16 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
10 March 2026, 14:12
More facts (6)
Position
vote 5 of 10 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Members · split vote: Members
Official label
A10-0018/2026 – André Franqueira Rodrigues – § 18/1
Text
Report A-10-2026-0018
Dossier
2025/2011(INI)
Vote id
188575
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 444 for, 153 against, 16 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 72 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: ‘Urges the Commission to ensure that the EU’s fisheries management approaches are aligned with the CFP, the EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030 and the EU’s international commitments such as the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework;’

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 37Against 1Abst. 0No vote 8 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
GreensFor 47Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 119Against 0Abst. 1No vote 15 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 62Against 2Abst. 0No vote 12 of 76Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.95
EPPFor 159Against 0Abst. 2No vote 25 of 186Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
ECRFor 7Against 61Abst. 5No vote 6 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.75
PatriotsFor 0Against 64Abst. 0No vote 20 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 1Against 20Abst. 2No vote 5 of 28Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.80
No groupFor 12Against 5Abst. 6No vote 8 of 31Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria030
Czechia100
Germany0130
Hungary001
Italy010
Lithuania001
Poland010
Slovakia020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 613 members

No vote recorded, 105

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 105 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
10 Mar 2026Paragraph 34 — part 2 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingSplit vote449 for, 163 against, 13 abstained Adopted For 72 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 603 voters
19 Jun 2025Recital R — part 3 Electricity grids: the backbone of the EU energy systemSplit vote396 for, 163 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.93 492 voters
9 Sept 2025Separate vote on paragraph 61 Public procurementSeparate vote464 for, 179 against, 8 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.93 553 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
19 Jun 2025Paragraph 21 — part 2 Electricity grids: the backbone of the EU energy systemSplit vote405 for, 163 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Renew, Greensr · shared0.93 496 voters
19 Jun 2025Recital R — part 2 Electricity grids: the backbone of the EU energy systemSplit vote405 for, 166 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.93 494 voters
9 Sept 2025Recital AH — part 2 of 2 Public procurementSplit vote448 for, 186 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.93 549 voters
23 Oct 2025Paragraph 71 — part 2 Key objectives for the CITES COP20 meeting in UzbekistanSplit vote374 for, 149 against, 34 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.93 481 voters
7 Jul 2026Paragraph 43 — part 2 A new strategy for media literacy and digital learningSplit vote464 for, 177 against, 3 abstained Adopted For 72 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.93 554 voters
9 Sept 2025Paragraph 58 — part 2 Public procurementSplit vote456 for, 187 against, 5 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.93 550 voters
19 Jun 2025Paragraph 33 — part 2 Electricity grids: the backbone of the EU energy systemSplit vote405 for, 169 against, 3 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.93 496 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 6 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/188575
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 18 — part 1 — Fisheries management approaches for safeguarding sensitive species, tackling invasive species and benefiting local economies”. Vote, 10 March 2026. votingId 188575, reference 2025/2011(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/188575 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-10/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-03-10-188575,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 18 — part 1 — Fisheries management approaches for safeguarding sensitive species, tackling invasive species and benefiting local economies}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-10},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/188575}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/188575},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 188575, reference 2025/2011(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10 (CC BY 4.0)}
}