Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 3 to paragraph 17

Fisheries management approaches for safeguarding sensitive species, tackling invasive species and benefiting local economies

Vote
Amendment 3 to paragraph 17
Result
217 for · 306 against · 86 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
10 March 2026, 14:12
More facts (6)
Position
vote 4 of 10 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
A10-0018/2026 – André Franqueira Rodrigues – § 17 – Am 3
Vote id
188574
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 217 for, 306 against, 86 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 36 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 37Against 0Abst. 0No vote 9 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 46Against 0Abst. 1No vote 6 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 49Against 68Abst. 1No vote 17 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.36
RenewFor 34Against 30Abst. 1No vote 11 of 76Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.28
EPPFor 22Against 126Abst. 11No vote 27 of 186Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.69
ECRFor 8Against 61Abst. 4No vote 6 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.75
PatriotsFor 7Against 0Abst. 57No vote 20 of 84Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.84
ESNFor 0Against 20Abst. 3No vote 5 of 28Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.80
No groupFor 14Against 1Abst. 8No vote 8 of 31Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria200
Belgium200
Czechia100
Germany1400
Denmark201
Spain300
Finland200
France300
Croatia100
Italy300
Lithuania100
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Netherlands600
Romania100
Sweden300

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 609 members

No vote recorded, 109

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 109 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Oct 2025Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 3 Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2024Amendment123 for, 459 against, 33 abstained Rejected For 20 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.62 525 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 30 to paragraph 8 — part 2 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2024Amendment130 for, 463 against, 77 abstained Rejected For 19 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.58 563 voters
22 Oct 2025Amendment 396 Draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sectionsAmendment121 for, 477 against, 49 abstained Rejected For 19 %r · shared0.57 544 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
26 Nov 2025Proposal to reject the text Deforestation Regulation: certain obligations of operators and tradersRejection134 for, 526 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 20 %r · shared0.57 569 voters
30 Apr 2026Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 18 How to secure a sustainable future for the EU livestock sector in light of the need to ensure food security, farmers’ resilience and the challenges posed by animal diseases?Amendment226 for, 325 against, 28 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.57 499 voters
30 Apr 2026Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 46 How to secure a sustainable future for the EU livestock sector in light of the need to ensure food security, farmers’ resilience and the challenges posed by animal diseases?Amendment244 for, 297 against, 41 abstained Rejected For 42 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.57 502 voters
17 Dec 2025Proposal to reject the text Deforestation Regulation: certain obligations of operators and tradersRejection138 for, 512 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 21 %r · shared0.57 561 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 62 to recital O Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingAmendment132 for, 472 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 21 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.57 594 voters
9 Oct 2025Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 8 Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2024Amendment101 for, 501 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 17 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.56 523 voters
9 Oct 2025Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 7 Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2024Amendment101 for, 497 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 17 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.56 519 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 3 to paragraph 17 — Fisheries management approaches for safeguarding sensitive species, tackling invasive species and benefiting local economies”. Vote, 10 March 2026. votingId 188574, reference 2025/2011(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/188574 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-10/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-03-10-188574,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 3 to paragraph 17 — Fisheries management approaches for safeguarding sensitive species, tackling invasive species and benefiting local economies}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-10},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/188574}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/188574},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 188574, reference 2025/2011(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10 (CC BY 4.0)}
}