Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 2 to paragraph 16

Fisheries management approaches for safeguarding sensitive species, tackling invasive species and benefiting local economies

Vote
Amendment 2 to paragraph 16
Decision
No. 9 of the sitting of 10 Mar 2026
Result
247 for · 334 against · 28 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
10 March 2026, 14:12
More facts (6)
Position
vote 3 of 10 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
A10-0018/2026 – André Franqueira Rodrigues – § 16 – Am 2
Text
Report A-10-2026-0018
Dossier
2025/2011(INI)
Vote id
188573
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 247 for, 334 against, 28 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 41 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 36Against 0Abst. 0No vote 10 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 47Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 58Against 59Abst. 0No vote 18 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.26
RenewFor 40Against 25Abst. 0No vote 11 of 76Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.42
EPPFor 29Against 128Abst. 6No vote 23 of 186Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.68
ECRFor 10Against 61Abst. 2No vote 6 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.75
PatriotsFor 6Against 57Abst. 1No vote 20 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.84
ESNFor 3Against 2Abst. 16No vote 7 of 28Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.64
No groupFor 18Against 2Abst. 3No vote 8 of 31Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria200
Belgium200
Czechia100
Germany1400
Denmark300
Spain300
Finland200
France300
Croatia100
Italy300
Lithuania100
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Netherlands600
Romania100
Sweden300

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 609 members

No vote recorded, 109

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 109 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Oct 2025Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 3 Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2024Amendment123 for, 459 against, 33 abstained Rejected For 20 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.62 525 voters
13 Nov 2025Paragraph 10 — part 2 Gender Equality Strategy 2025Split vote295 for, 302 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 49 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.58 521 voters
13 Nov 2025Recital D — part 3 Gender Equality Strategy 2025Split vote289 for, 289 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 49 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.58 504 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Paragraph 74 — part 2 Gender Equality Strategy 2025Split vote258 for, 325 against, 21 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.58 523 voters
13 Nov 2025Recital G — part 2 Gender Equality Strategy 2025Split vote254 for, 335 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 42 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.57 524 voters
30 Apr 2026Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 37 How to secure a sustainable future for the EU livestock sector in light of the need to ensure food security, farmers’ resilience and the challenges posed by animal diseases?Amendment175 for, 375 against, 33 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.57 500 voters
9 Oct 2025Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 6 Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2024Amendment129 for, 449 against, 34 abstained Rejected For 21 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.57 522 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 65 to paragraph 81 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2024Amendment349 for, 288 against, 29 abstained Adopted For 52 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.57 561 voters
9 Oct 2025Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 5 Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2024Amendment128 for, 431 against, 51 abstained Rejected For 21 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.57 521 voters
13 Nov 2025Separate vote on paragraph 73 Gender Equality Strategy 2025Separate vote279 for, 289 against, 42 abstained Rejected For 46 %Requested by Renew, S&Dr · shared0.57 524 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 6 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/188573
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 2 to paragraph 16 — Fisheries management approaches for safeguarding sensitive species, tackling invasive species and benefiting local economies”. Vote, 10 March 2026. votingId 188573, reference 2025/2011(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/188573 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-10/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-03-10-188573,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 2 to paragraph 16 — Fisheries management approaches for safeguarding sensitive species, tackling invasive species and benefiting local economies}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-10},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/188573}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/188573},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 188573, reference 2025/2011(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10 (CC BY 4.0)}
}