Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 8 — part 2

Fisheries management approaches for safeguarding sensitive species, tackling invasive species and benefiting local economies

Vote
Paragraph 8 — part 2
Result
455 for · 147 against · 12 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
10 March 2026, 14:11
More facts (6)
Position
vote 2 of 10 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Members · split vote: Members
Official label
A10-0018/2026 – André Franqueira Rodrigues – § 8/2
Vote id
188572
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 455 for, 147 against, 12 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 74 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “highlights the EU target of protecting 30 % of EU seas by 2030;”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 37Against 0Abst. 0No vote 9 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 47Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 122Against 0Abst. 0No vote 13 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 66Against 0Abst. 0No vote 10 of 76Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 161Against 2Abst. 0No vote 23 of 186Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
ECRFor 9Against 59Abst. 3No vote 8 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.75
PatriotsFor 0Against 63Abst. 0No vote 21 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 21Abst. 1No vote 6 of 28Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
No groupFor 13Against 2Abst. 8No vote 8 of 31Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria050
Belgium020
Czechia070
Denmark010
Spain040
France0210
Greece010
Hungary060
Italy060
Latvia010
Netherlands050
Poland020
Portugal020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 614 members

No vote recorded, 104

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 104 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
22 Jan 2026Paragraph 10 — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote427 for, 161 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.95 530 voters
7 Jul 2025Wednesday’s agenda — Request by The Left Group Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by The Left GroupOther308 for, 101 against, 0 abstained Adopted For 75 %r · shared0.94 347 voters
9 Sept 2025Recital AH — part 2 of 2 Public procurementSplit vote448 for, 186 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.94 550 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
22 Jan 2026Recital Q — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote421 for, 150 against, 35 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.94 529 voters
9 Oct 2025Recital D — part 2 Humanitarian and security situation in Haiti, in particular the rising power of criminal gangs and the recent massacre in CabaretSplit vote434 for, 161 against, 12 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 528 voters
30 Apr 2026Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 10 Estimates of revenue and expenditure for the financial year 2027 – Section I – European ParliamentAmendment402 for, 135 against, 46 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.93 505 voters
22 Jan 2026Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 3 European technological sovereignty and digital infrastructureAmendment426 for, 180 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Patriots, Renewr · shared0.93 548 voters
22 Jan 2026Paragraph 11 — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote430 for, 157 against, 20 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.93 528 voters
22 Jan 2026Recital O — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote426 for, 151 against, 31 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.93 528 voters
9 Sept 2025Paragraph 86 — part 2 Public procurementSplit vote450 for, 183 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.93 545 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 8 — part 2 — Fisheries management approaches for safeguarding sensitive species, tackling invasive species and benefiting local economies”. Vote, 10 March 2026. votingId 188572, reference 2025/2011(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/188572 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-10/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-03-10-188572,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 8 — part 2 — Fisheries management approaches for safeguarding sensitive species, tackling invasive species and benefiting local economies}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-10},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/188572}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/188572},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 188572, reference 2025/2011(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10 (CC BY 4.0)}
}