Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 4 to paragraph 11

The upcoming European Research Area (ERA) Act

Vote
Amendment 4 to paragraph 11
Decision
No. 10 of the sitting of 10 Mar 2026
Result
164 for · 418 against · 21 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
10 March 2026, 14:16
More facts (6)
Position
vote 12 of 18 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots
Official label
B10-0156/2026 – § 11 – Am 4
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0156
Dossier
2025/2951(RSP)
Vote id
188562
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 164 for, 418 against, 21 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 27 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 36Abst. 0No vote 10 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 47Abst. 0No vote 6 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 1Against 119Abst. 0No vote 15 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 0Against 66Abst. 0No vote 10 of 76Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 10Against 144Abst. 4No vote 28 of 186Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.87
ECRFor 56Against 2Abst. 11No vote 10 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.72
PatriotsFor 62Against 1Abst. 0No vote 21 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
ESNFor 22Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 28Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 13Against 3Abst. 6No vote 9 of 31Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria300
Czechia100
Germany1300
Hungary100
Italy100
Poland100
Slovakia200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 603 members

No vote recorded, 115

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 115 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
25 Nov 2025Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 1 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedAmendment186 for, 447 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.98 547 voters
25 Nov 2025Amendment 9 to paragraph 2 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedAmendment184 for, 450 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.97 547 voters
25 Nov 2025Amendment 14 to paragraph 12 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedAmendment194 for, 439 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.97 546 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
25 Nov 2025Amendment 15 to paragraph 13 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedAmendment187 for, 444 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.97 546 voters
25 Nov 2025Amendment 6, adding text after recital H Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedAmendment182 for, 447 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.97 545 voters
22 Oct 2025Amendment 130, adding text after paragraph 18 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sectionsAmendment193 for, 451 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 550 voters
25 Nov 2025Amendment 11 to paragraph 4 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedAmendment191 for, 443 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.96 546 voters
25 Nov 2025Amendment 1 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedAmendment184 for, 441 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 545 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 69, adding text after paragraph 26 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment193 for, 472 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 562 voters
25 Nov 2025Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 2 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedAmendment182 for, 446 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.96 546 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/188562
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 4 to paragraph 11 — The upcoming European Research Area (ERA) Act”. Vote, 10 March 2026. votingId 188562, reference 2025/2951(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/188562 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-10/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-03-10-188562,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 4 to paragraph 11 — The upcoming European Research Area (ERA) Act}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-10},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/188562}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/188562},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 188562, reference 2025/2951(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10 (CC BY 4.0)}
}