Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 16, after paragraph 6

The upcoming European Research Area (ERA) Act

Vote
Amendment 16, after paragraph 6
Decision
No. 10 of the sitting of 10 Mar 2026
Result
283 for · 262 against · 60 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
10 March 2026, 14:15
More facts (6)
Position
vote 9 of 18 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
B10-0156/2026 – After § 6 – Am 16
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0156
Dossier
2025/2951(RSP)
Vote id
188559
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 283 for, 262 against, 60 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 47 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 33Against 0Abst. 0No vote 13 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 46Against 1Abst. 0No vote 6 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 22Against 97Abst. 0No vote 16 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.72
RenewFor 1Against 65Abst. 0No vote 10 of 76Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 155Against 2Abst. 3No vote 26 of 186Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.95
ECRFor 5Against 62Abst. 4No vote 8 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.81
PatriotsFor 5Against 13Abst. 45No vote 21 of 84Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.57
ESNFor 0Against 20Abst. 3No vote 5 of 28Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.80
No groupFor 16Against 2Abst. 5No vote 8 of 31Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria050
Belgium020
Czechia511
Denmark001
Spain004
France0021
Greece001
Hungary007
Italy005
Latvia001
Netherlands050
Poland002
Portugal002

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 605 members

No vote recorded, 113

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 113 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
18 Jun 2026Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 6 Continued crackdown on civic space and fundamental freedoms in Burkina FasoAmendment263 for, 269 against, 25 abstained Rejected For 47 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.82 474 voters
24 Feb 2026Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 22 Four years of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and European contributions to a just peace and sustained security for UkraineAmendment280 for, 267 against, 47 abstained Adopted For 47 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.66 519 voters
22 Jan 2026Paragraph 10 — part 2 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote334 for, 259 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 55 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.62 525 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
22 Jan 2026Recital L — part 2 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote328 for, 237 against, 33 abstained Adopted For 55 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.61 512 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 47 to paragraph 67 Public procurementAmendment322 for, 261 against, 63 abstained Adopted For 50 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.60 546 voters
9 Oct 2025Paragraph 27 — part 3 United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructureSplit vote204 for, 380 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 34 %r · shared0.58 516 voters
22 Jan 2026Recital J — part 2 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote327 for, 235 against, 42 abstained Adopted For 54 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.57 519 voters
22 Oct 2025Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 18 Polarisation and increased repression in Serbia, one year after the Novi Sad tragedyAmendment111 for, 213 against, 311 abstained Rejected For 17 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.54 536 voters
22 Oct 2025Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 2 Polarisation and increased repression in Serbia, one year after the Novi Sad tragedyAmendment312 for, 281 against, 43 abstained Adopted For 49 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.51 538 voters
21 May 2026Final vote — text as a whole Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gapFinal263 for, 83 against, 154 abstained Adopted For 53 %r · shared0.51 428 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/188559
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 16, after paragraph 6 — The upcoming European Research Area (ERA) Act”. Vote, 10 March 2026. votingId 188559, reference 2025/2951(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/188559 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-10/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-03-10-188559,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 16, after paragraph 6 — The upcoming European Research Area (ERA) Act}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-10},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/188559}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/188559},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 188559, reference 2025/2951(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10 (CC BY 4.0)}
}