Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 2, after paragraph 4

The upcoming European Research Area (ERA) Act

Vote
Amendment 2, after paragraph 4
Decision
No. 10 of the sitting of 10 Mar 2026
Result
162 for · 425 against · 15 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
10 March 2026, 14:14
More facts (6)
Position
vote 4 of 18 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots
Official label
B10-0156/2026 – After § 4 – Am 2
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0156
Dossier
2025/2951(RSP)
Vote id
188555
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 162 for, 425 against, 15 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 27 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 1Against 37Abst. 0No vote 8 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
GreensFor 0Against 47Abst. 0No vote 6 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 120Abst. 0No vote 15 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 65Abst. 0No vote 11 of 76Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 4Against 147Abst. 0No vote 35 of 186Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
ECRFor 62Against 2Abst. 8No vote 7 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.79
PatriotsFor 62Against 1Abst. 1No vote 20 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.95
ESNFor 23Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 28Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 10Against 6Abst. 6No vote 9 of 31Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium020
Cyprus010
Germany040
Spain020
Finland020
France150
Greece030
Ireland030
Italy0100
Netherlands010
Portugal020
Sweden020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 602 members

No vote recorded, 116

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 116 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
15 Sept 2026Amendment 115, adding text after recital 14 Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measuresAmendment189 for, 478 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.97 564 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 17 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment188 for, 457 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.97 549 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 116, adding text after recital 36 Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measuresAmendment185 for, 480 against, 1 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.96 561 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
18 Jun 2025Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 74 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportAmendment183 for, 451 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by S&D, Membersr · shared0.96 546 voters
18 Jun 2025Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 11 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportAmendment192 for, 450 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.96 551 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 395 to recital 19 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment187 for, 442 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.96 538 voters
31 Mar 2025Tuesday's agenda — Request by the PfE Group Final vote Tuesday's agenda – Request by the PfE GroupOther118 for, 326 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 26 %r · shared0.96 377 voters
18 Jun 2025Amendment 16 to paragraph 17 Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience FacilityAmendment188 for, 457 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.96 552 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 26 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment191 for, 472 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 566 voters
19 Jun 2025Amendment 35 to paragraph 17 Clean Industrial DealAmendment170 for, 379 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by S&D, Patriotsr · shared0.96 472 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/188555
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 2, after paragraph 4 — The upcoming European Research Area (ERA) Act”. Vote, 10 March 2026. votingId 188555, reference 2025/2951(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/188555 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-10/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-03-10-188555,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 2, after paragraph 4 — The upcoming European Research Area (ERA) Act}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-10},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/188555}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/188555},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 188555, reference 2025/2951(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10 (CC BY 4.0)}
}