Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 1, after recital H

Copyright and generative artificial intelligence – opportunities and challenges

Vote
Amendment 1, after recital H
Result
174 for · 410 against · 18 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
10 March 2026, 14:09
More facts (6)
Position
vote 2 of 3 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots
Official label
A10-0019/2026 – Axel Voss – After recital H – Am 1
Vote id
188552
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 174 for, 410 against, 18 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 29 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 24Abst. 12No vote 10 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.50
GreensFor 0Against 47Abst. 0No vote 6 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 4Against 113Abst. 0No vote 18 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.95
RenewFor 0Against 65Abst. 0No vote 11 of 76Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 3Against 153Abst. 1No vote 29 of 186Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
ECRFor 66Against 1Abst. 4No vote 8 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.89
PatriotsFor 64Against 0Abst. 0No vote 20 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 21Against 1Abst. 0No vote 6 of 28Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
No groupFor 16Against 6Abst. 1No vote 8 of 31Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria010
Cyprus100
Czechia300
Germany410
France010
Greece130
Luxembourg100
Poland001
Romania100
Slovakia500

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 602 members

No vote recorded, 116

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 116 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
26 Mar 2026Amendment 99 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)Amendment203 for, 426 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.94 543 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 10 Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment173 for, 426 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.94 582 voters
17 Jun 2026Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 49 2025 Commission report on AlbaniaAmendment195 for, 429 against, 21 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 542 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
16 Jun 2026Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 20 European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities fundedAmendment202 for, 465 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.94 562 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 1 Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseAmendment193 for, 431 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 536 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 32 Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment178 for, 435 against, 0 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.94 593 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 5 to recital N EU-Uzbekistan Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (resolution)Amendment191 for, 448 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.94 550 voters
16 Jun 2026Amendment 3, adding text after recital A European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities fundedAmendment202 for, 461 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.94 562 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 71, adding text after paragraph 38 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment198 for, 458 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.93 553 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 76 A revamped long-term budget for the Union in a changing worldAmendment179 for, 439 against, 17 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Members, Patriotsr · shared0.93 536 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 3 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 1, after recital H — Copyright and generative artificial intelligence – opportunities and challenges”. Vote, 10 March 2026. votingId 188552, reference 2025/2058(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/188552 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-10/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-03-10-188552,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 1, after recital H — Copyright and generative artificial intelligence – opportunities and challenges}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-10},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/188552}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/188552},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 188552, reference 2025/2058(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10 (CC BY 4.0)}
}