Skip to content

Dossier · Own-initiative report

Copyright and generative artificial intelligence – opportunities and challenges

Reference
2025/2058(INI) Own-initiative report
Where it stands
Parliament adopted the text on 10 March 2026. This is its final position on the matter.
Stage
Parliament’s position
Lead committee
Legal Affairs JURI
More facts (5)
Author
Axel VOSS
Shadow rapporteurs
6 members
Decisions in plenary
1
Versions
3 versions

Where it stands

The steps of this kind of dossier and how far it has come, from the procedure file.

  1. Referred to committee (done) 13 March 2025
  2. Committee work (done) Report adopted 28 January 2026
  3. Tabled for plenary (done) 25 February 2026
  4. Plenary vote (done) Adopted 10 March 2026
  5. Parliament’s position (done) Final

Parliament sets out its own position on a topic. The resolution is not binding but signals what Parliament wants.

People

Committees and members responsible for the dossier, as the procedure file names them. Groups as recorded there.

Lead committee
Legal Affairs JURI
Author
Axel VOSS (EPP)

Decisions in plenary, 1

Every decision Parliament took on this dossier, newest first.

Effect: what the decision did. Final vote: for–against–abstained, and how it was recorded.
DateDecisionKindEffectFinal vote
10 Mar 2026Copyright and generative artificial intelligence – opportunities and challenges ResolutionsAdopted460 for, 71 against, 88 abstained by roll call

Voting grid

Export

Every roll-call vote on the dossier, in date and voting order, with each group's line at the date of the vote.

Each group's clear line at the date of the vote: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided; “< 10 voted” when fewer took part. Result: outcome, for–against–abstained (method).

  1. Rejected 159–426–26

    The Left
    Against
    Greens
    Against
    S&D
    Against
    Renew
    Against
    EPP
    Against
    ECR
    For
    Patriots
    For
    ESN
    Abst.
  2. Rejected 174–410–18

    The Left
    Against
    Greens
    Against
    S&D
    Against
    Renew
    Against
    EPP
    Against
    ECR
    For
    Patriots
    For
    ESN
    For
  3. Adopted 460–71–88

    The Left
    For
    Greens
    For
    S&D
    For
    Renew
    For
    EPP
    For
    ECR
    Divided
    Patriots
    Abst.
    ESN
    Against
Add members’ columns
The people on this dossier — pick up to 6. Each gets a column with their own position.

Versions, 3

The text of the dossier, version by version, newest first. Compare shows what changed between two consecutive versions.

  1. Adopted by Parliament10 Mar 2026

    Adopted text TA10-0066/2026 TA-10-2026-0066

    Compare with tabled for plenary

  2. Tabled for plenary25 Feb 2026

    Report A10-0019/2026 A-10-2026-0019

    Compare with committee draft

  3. Committee draft27 Jun 2025

    Draft report (JURI) JURI-PR-775433

AI: Each version in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source
  • Adopted text TA10-0066/2026: Parliament's resolution on copyright and generative AI notes current law is insufficient and calls for a new legal framework to clarify licensing, ensure transparency, and protect creators.
  • Report A10-0019/2026: This resolution addresses copyright and generative AI, calling for a new legal framework to clarify licensing, ensure transparency, and protect creators' rights.
  • Draft report (JURI): This draft report addresses copyright and generative AI, recommending that the Commission assess the EU copyright framework, impose remuneration for AI training use, clarify the text and data mining exception, and establish transparency and opt-out mechanisms.

Report a problem

What changed, 2

Between consecutive versions, newest pair first. The overviews are written by AI from the two texts; the comparison shows every change.

  1. Latest Tabled for plenary → Adopted by Parliament Report A10-0019/2026 → Adopted text TA10-0066/2026

    AI: What changed Written by AI from the official text — check the source

    The versions differ only in formal points: decimal separator and punctuation are updated.

    Read the changes · Report a problem

    Compare the two versions

  2. Committee draft → Tabled for plenary Draft report (JURI) → Report A10-0019/2026

    AI: What changed Written by AI from the official text — check the source

    The new version substantially expands the preamble, adding recitals on economic impact, digital rights, competitiveness, and specific AI-related concerns, while removing several original recitals. The recommendations are restructured and expanded, adding new calls on licensing, transparency, territoriality, and protection against deep fakes, while removing some original recommendations. The changes also include formal updates, such as revised references to the AI Act and the CDSM Directive, and wording adjustments throughout.

    Read the changes · Report a problem

    Compare the two versions

Timeline, 7

Every recorded step, newest first, grouped by stage; the latest stage is open.

Plenary stage 3 steps · 25 Feb 2026–10 Mar 2026
  1. 10 March 2026

    Plenary vote

    Sitting of 10 Mar 2026 Report A10-0019/2026Adopted text TA10-0066/2026

  2. 4 March 2026

    2 amendments tabled for the plenary vote

    Groups propose changes to the tabled text; each is voted on before the final vote.

    Amendments 1–2

  3. 25 February 2026

    Report tabled for plenary

    This is the text all MEPs vote on. Political groups can still table amendments to it.

    Report A10-0019/2026

Committee stage 4 steps · 13 Mar 2025–28 Jan 2026
  1. 28 January 2026

    Committee vote: report adopted

    JURI (Legal Affairs) voted on the amendments and adopted the report that goes to plenary.

  2. 15 September 2025

    Amendments tabled in committee

    Members of JURI (Legal Affairs) proposed changes to the draft.

    Amendments in committee (JURI)

  3. 27 June 2025

    Draft report published

    The rapporteur’s first text in JURI (Legal Affairs). Members can table amendments before the committee votes.

    Draft report (JURI)

  4. 13 March 2025

    Referred to the JURI (Legal Affairs) committee

    The lead committee prepares Parliament’s report.

Connections

Texts, decisions, people and other dossiers related to this one.

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Copyright and generative artificial intelligence – opportunities and challenges”. Dossier, 10 March 2026. procId 2025-2058, reference 2025/2058(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/dossiers/2025-2058 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Procedure file (Legislative Observatory, OEIL), https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/en/procedure-file?reference=2025%2F2058(INI). Data: EP Open Data API: procedure record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/procedures/2025-2058 (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-dossier-2025-2058,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Copyright and generative artificial intelligence – opportunities and challenges}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-10},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/dossiers/2025-2058}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/dossiers/2025-2058},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Dossier. procId 2025-2058, reference 2025/2058(INI). Official source: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/en/procedure-file?reference=2025\%2F2058(INI). Data: EP Open Data API: procedure record (CC BY 4.0)}
}