Dossier · Own-initiative report
Copyright and generative artificial intelligence – opportunities and challenges
- Reference
- 2025/2058(INI) Own-initiative report
- Where it stands
- Parliament adopted the text on 10 March 2026. This is its final position on the matter.
- Stage
- Parliament’s position
- Lead committee
- Legal Affairs JURI
More facts (5)
- Author
- Axel VOSS
- Shadow rapporteurs
- 6 members
- Decisions in plenary
- 1
- Last vote
- 10 Mar 2026 · Adopted
- Versions
- 3 versions
Where it stands
The steps of this kind of dossier and how far it has come, from the procedure file.
- Referred to committee (done) 13 March 2025
- Committee work (done) Report adopted 28 January 2026
- Tabled for plenary (done) 25 February 2026
- Plenary vote (done) Adopted 10 March 2026
- Parliament’s position (done) Final
Parliament sets out its own position on a topic. The resolution is not binding but signals what Parliament wants.
People
Committees and members responsible for the dossier, as the procedure file names them. Groups as recorded there.
- Lead committee
- Legal Affairs JURI
- Author
- Axel VOSS (EPP)
- Shadow rapporteurs
- Tiemo WÖLKEN (S&D), Ton DIEPEVEEN (Patriots), Kosma ZŁOTOWSKI (ECR), Laurence FARRENG (Renew), David CORMAND (Greens), Mario FURORE (The Left)
Decisions in plenary, 1
Every decision Parliament took on this dossier, newest first.
| Date | Decision | Kind | Effect | Final vote |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 Mar 2026 | Copyright and generative artificial intelligence – opportunities and challenges | Resolutions | Adopted | 460 for, 71 against, 88 abstained by roll call |
Every roll-call vote on the dossier, in date and voting order, with each group's line at the date of the vote.
Each group's clear line at the date of the vote: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided; “< 10 voted” when fewer took part. Result: outcome, for–against–abstained (method).
- 10 Mar 2026 Amendment 2 to paragraph 3
Rejected 159–426–26
- The Left
- Against
- Greens
- Against
- S&D
- Against
- Renew
- Against
- EPP
- Against
- ECR
- For
- Patriots
- For
- ESN
- Abst.
- 10 Mar 2026 Amendment 1, adding text after recital H
Rejected 174–410–18
- The Left
- Against
- Greens
- Against
- S&D
- Against
- Renew
- Against
- EPP
- Against
- ECR
- For
- Patriots
- For
- ESN
- For
- 10 Mar 2026 Final vote — text as a whole
Adopted 460–71–88
- The Left
- For
- Greens
- For
- S&D
- For
- Renew
- For
- EPP
- For
- ECR
- Divided
- Patriots
- Abst.
- ESN
- Against
Add members’ columns
Versions, 3
The text of the dossier, version by version, newest first. Compare shows what changed between two consecutive versions.
Adopted by Parliament10 Mar 2026
Adopted text TA10-0066/2026 TA-10-2026-0066
Tabled for plenary25 Feb 2026
Report A10-0019/2026 A-10-2026-0019
Committee draft27 Jun 2025
Draft report (JURI) JURI-PR-775433
AI: Each version in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source
- Adopted text TA10-0066/2026: Parliament's resolution on copyright and generative AI notes current law is insufficient and calls for a new legal framework to clarify licensing, ensure transparency, and protect creators.
- Report A10-0019/2026: This resolution addresses copyright and generative AI, calling for a new legal framework to clarify licensing, ensure transparency, and protect creators' rights.
- Draft report (JURI): This draft report addresses copyright and generative AI, recommending that the Commission assess the EU copyright framework, impose remuneration for AI training use, clarify the text and data mining exception, and establish transparency and opt-out mechanisms.
What changed, 2
Between consecutive versions, newest pair first. The overviews are written by AI from the two texts; the comparison shows every change.
Latest Tabled for plenary → Adopted by Parliament Report A10-0019/2026 → Adopted text TA10-0066/2026
AI: What changed Written by AI from the official text — check the source
The versions differ only in formal points: decimal separator and punctuation are updated.
Committee draft → Tabled for plenary Draft report (JURI) → Report A10-0019/2026
AI: What changed Written by AI from the official text — check the source
The new version substantially expands the preamble, adding recitals on economic impact, digital rights, competitiveness, and specific AI-related concerns, while removing several original recitals. The recommendations are restructured and expanded, adding new calls on licensing, transparency, territoriality, and protection against deep fakes, while removing some original recommendations. The changes also include formal updates, such as revised references to the AI Act and the CDSM Directive, and wording adjustments throughout.
Timeline, 7
Every recorded step, newest first, grouped by stage; the latest stage is open.
Plenary stage 3 steps · 25 Feb 2026–10 Mar 2026
10 March 2026
Plenary vote
Sitting of 10 Mar 2026 Report A10-0019/2026Adopted text TA10-0066/2026
4 March 2026
2 amendments tabled for the plenary vote
Groups propose changes to the tabled text; each is voted on before the final vote.
25 February 2026
Report tabled for plenary
This is the text all MEPs vote on. Political groups can still table amendments to it.
Committee stage 4 steps · 13 Mar 2025–28 Jan 2026
28 January 2026
Committee vote: report adopted
JURI (Legal Affairs) voted on the amendments and adopted the report that goes to plenary.
15 September 2025
Amendments tabled in committee
Members of JURI (Legal Affairs) proposed changes to the draft.
27 June 2025
Draft report published
The rapporteur’s first text in JURI (Legal Affairs). Members can table amendments before the committee votes.
13 March 2025
Referred to the JURI (Legal Affairs) committee
The lead committee prepares Parliament’s report.
Connections
Texts, decisions, people and other dossiers related to this one.
Texts voted on
- Text REPORT on copyright and generative artificial intelligence – opportunities and challenges Report A10-0019/2026 10 Mar 2026
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Official source
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Retrieved
- 25 September 2026
Cite as
European Parliament (2026). “Copyright and generative artificial intelligence – opportunities and challenges”. Dossier, 10 March 2026. procId 2025-2058, reference 2025/2058(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/dossiers/2025-2058 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Procedure file (Legislative Observatory, OEIL), https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/en/procedure-file?reference=2025%2F2058(INI). Data: EP Open Data API: procedure record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/procedures/2025-2058 (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-dossier-2025-2058,
author = {{European Parliament}},
title = {{Copyright and generative artificial intelligence – opportunities and challenges}},
year = {2026},
date = {2026-03-10},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/dossiers/2025-2058}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/dossiers/2025-2058},
urldate = {2026-09-25},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Dossier. procId 2025-2058, reference 2025/2058(INI). Official source: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/en/procedure-file?reference=2025\%2F2058(INI). Data: EP Open Data API: procedure record (CC BY 4.0)}
}