Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 2 to paragraph 3

Copyright and generative artificial intelligence – opportunities and challenges

Vote
Amendment 2 to paragraph 3
Decision
No. 8 of the sitting of 10 Mar 2026
Result
159 for · 426 against · 26 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
10 March 2026, 14:09
More facts (6)
Position
vote 1 of 3 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots
Official label
A10-0019/2026 – Axel Voss – § 3 – Am 2
Text
Report A-10-2026-0019
Dossier
2025/2058(INI)
Vote id
188551
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 159 for, 426 against, 26 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 26 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 30Abst. 5No vote 11 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.79
GreensFor 1Against 46Abst. 0No vote 6 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 0Against 120Abst. 0No vote 15 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 67Abst. 0No vote 9 of 76Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 9Against 152Abst. 0No vote 25 of 186Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.92
ECRFor 66Against 5Abst. 2No vote 6 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.86
PatriotsFor 64Against 0Abst. 0No vote 20 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 4Against 1Abst. 17No vote 6 of 28Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.66
No groupFor 15Against 5Abst. 2No vote 9 of 31Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria003
Czechia100
Germany0012
Hungary100
Italy100
Lithuania100
Poland010
Slovakia002

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 611 members

No vote recorded, 107

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 107 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
10 Jul 2025Amendment 1 to paragraph 14 Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictionsAmendment157 for, 428 against, 36 abstained Rejected For 25 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.93 530 voters
20 Jan 2025Ordre du jour de mercredi — Demande du groupe PfE Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE GroupOther108 for, 313 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 25 %r · shared0.92 353 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 45 Human rights and democracy in the world and the European Union’s policy on the matter – annual report 2024Amendment185 for, 456 against, 19 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.92 561 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Jul 2025Amendment 4, adding text after recital C 2023 and 2024 reports on AlbaniaAmendment222 for, 443 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.91 570 voters
9 Jul 2025Amendment 9, adding text after recital M 2023 and 2024 reports on Bosnia and HerzegovinaAmendment212 for, 469 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.91 577 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 42, adding text after paragraph 18 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment196 for, 451 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Greens, ESNr · shared0.91 556 voters
9 Jul 2025Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 29 2023 and 2024 reports on Bosnia and HerzegovinaAmendment219 for, 449 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.91 570 voters
22 Jan 2026Amendment 5 to paragraph 66 European technological sovereignty and digital infrastructureAmendment175 for, 436 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.91 547 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 41, adding text after paragraph 18 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment198 for, 452 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Greens, ESNr · shared0.91 559 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 3 to recital F The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basinsAmendment198 for, 440 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.91 555 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 3 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/188551
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 2 to paragraph 3 — Copyright and generative artificial intelligence – opportunities and challenges”. Vote, 10 March 2026. votingId 188551, reference 2025/2058(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/188551 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-10/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-03-10-188551,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 2 to paragraph 3 — Copyright and generative artificial intelligence – opportunities and challenges}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-10},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/188551}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/188551},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 188551, reference 2025/2058(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10 (CC BY 4.0)}
}