Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Recital R — part 2

Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing

Vote
Recital R — part 2
Result
441 for · 148 against · 20 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
10 March 2026, 14:00
More facts (6)
Position
vote 237 of 260 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots · split vote: ECR
Official label
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – Recital R/2
Vote id
187418
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 441 for, 148 against, 20 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 72 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “whereas labour migrants and seasonal workers make a contribution to key sectors across the EU, yet many are housed in overcrowded or poor accommodation;”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 37Against 0Abst. 0No vote 9 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 46Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 116Against 0Abst. 0No vote 19 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 68Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 76Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 155Against 1Abst. 0No vote 30 of 186Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 1Against 69Abst. 2No vote 7 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
PatriotsFor 0Against 54Abst. 11No vote 19 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.75
ESNFor 0Against 22Abst. 1No vote 5 of 28Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
No groupFor 18Against 2Abst. 6No vote 5 of 31Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria500
Belgium300
Bulgaria300
Cyprus100
Czechia500
Germany2800
Denmark010
Estonia200
Spain1800
Finland400
France500
Greece700
Croatia500
Ireland300
Italy800
Lithuania300
Luxembourg200
Latvia200
Malta200
Netherlands600
Poland1700
Portugal700
Romania900
Sweden400
Slovenia500
Slovakia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 609 members

No vote recorded, 109

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 109 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Sept 2025Recital AH — part 2 of 2 Public procurementSplit vote448 for, 186 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.95 546 voters
9 Sept 2025Paragraph 58 — part 2 Public procurementSplit vote456 for, 187 against, 5 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.95 548 voters
9 Sept 2025Separate vote on recital AA Public procurementSeparate vote430 for, 183 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.95 524 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Sept 2025Paragraph 86 — part 2 Public procurementSplit vote450 for, 183 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.95 542 voters
22 Jan 2026Recital Q — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote421 for, 150 against, 35 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.95 528 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 137 to Article 6, paragraph 3, alinéa 1 — part 1 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment461 for, 185 against, 5 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.94 551 voters
7 Jul 2025Wednesday’s agenda — Request by The Left Group Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by The Left GroupOther308 for, 101 against, 0 abstained Adopted For 75 %r · shared0.94 348 voters
26 Nov 2025Paragraph 25 — part 2 Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and materialSplit vote467 for, 190 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 70 %r · shared0.94 573 voters
22 Jan 2026Recital O — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote426 for, 151 against, 31 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.94 527 voters
11 Mar 2026Paragraph 24 — part 2 European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026Split vote444 for, 176 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 585 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Recital R — part 2 — Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing”. Vote, 10 March 2026. votingId 187418, reference 2025/2070(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187418 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-10/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-03-10-187418,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Recital R — part 2 — Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-10},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187418}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187418},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 187418, reference 2025/2070(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10 (CC BY 4.0)}
}