Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 92, after recital O

Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing

Vote
Amendment 92, after recital O
Result
170 for · 441 against · 10 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
10 March 2026, 13:58
More facts (6)
Position
vote 230 of 260 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots
Official label
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After recital O – Am 92
Vote id
187409
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 170 for, 441 against, 10 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 27 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 37Abst. 0No vote 9 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 47Abst. 0No vote 6 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 1Against 120Abst. 0No vote 14 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 0Against 69Abst. 0No vote 7 of 76Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 6Against 147Abst. 6No vote 27 of 186Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.89
ECRFor 71Against 2Abst. 0No vote 6 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
PatriotsFor 60Against 5Abst. 0No vote 19 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.88
ESNFor 24Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 28Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 8Against 14Abst. 4No vote 5 of 31Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria040
Belgium030
Bulgaria130
Czechia014
Germany0290
Denmark020
Estonia020
Spain0180
Finland040
France050
Greece070
Croatia041
Ireland030
Italy090
Lithuania030
Luxembourg020
Latvia020
Malta020
Netherlands240
Poland1180
Portugal070
Romania080
Sweden040
Slovenia230
Slovakia001

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 621 members

No vote recorded, 97

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 97 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Amendment 45 to paragraph 253 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionAmendment187 for, 453 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.95 575 voters
19 Jun 2025Amendment 35 to paragraph 17 Clean Industrial DealAmendment170 for, 379 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by S&D, Patriotsr · shared0.94 481 voters
26 Mar 2026Amendment 89 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)Amendment189 for, 438 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 560 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
26 Mar 2026Amendment 88 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)Amendment195 for, 443 against, 0 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 563 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 16 to paragraph 44 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAmendment181 for, 419 against, 22 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.94 546 voters
26 Mar 2026Amendment 101 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)Amendment196 for, 431 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.94 561 voters
26 Mar 2026Amendment 96 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)Amendment189 for, 443 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.94 564 voters
19 Jun 2025Amendment 3 to recital Q Electricity grids: the backbone of the EU energy systemAmendment167 for, 405 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Renew, Membersr · shared0.94 496 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 17 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment188 for, 457 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.94 564 voters
12 Feb 2026Amendment 1 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategyAmendment157 for, 411 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 27 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 514 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 92, after recital O — Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing”. Vote, 10 March 2026. votingId 187409, reference 2025/2070(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187409 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-10/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-03-10-187409,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 92, after recital O — Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-10},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187409}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187409},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 187409, reference 2025/2070(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10 (CC BY 4.0)}
}