Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Recital J — part 2

Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing

Vote
Recital J — part 2
Decision
No. 6 of the sitting of 10 Mar 2026
Result
422 for · 172 against · 25 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
10 March 2026, 13:57
More facts (6)
Position
vote 220 of 260 on the decision
Requested by
split vote: ECR, Patriots
Official label
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – recital J/2
Text
Report A-10-2026-0025
Dossier
2025/2070(INI)
Vote id
187397
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 422 for, 172 against, 25 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 68 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “whereas key EU legislation to achieve long-term financial stability, such as the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive and the Energy Efficiency Directive, sets technical requirements regarding sustainability, energy efficiency, and safety;”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 35Against 0Abst. 1No vote 10 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
GreensFor 46Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 108Against 12Abst. 0No vote 15 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.85
RenewFor 67Against 0Abst. 0No vote 9 of 76Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 154Against 6Abst. 2No vote 24 of 186Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
ECRFor 1Against 66Abst. 6No vote 6 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.86
PatriotsFor 6Against 52Abst. 8No vote 18 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.68
ESNFor 0Against 21Abst. 2No vote 5 of 28Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.87
No groupFor 5Against 15Abst. 6No vote 5 of 31Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria060
Belgium030
Czechia070
Denmark010
Spain040
France0201
Greece010
Hungary007
Italy150
Latvia010
Netherlands500
Poland020
Portugal020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 619 members

No vote recorded, 99

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 99 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Sept 2025Paragraph 67 — part 2 2023 and 2024 reports on UkraineSplit vote428 for, 173 against, 34 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.88 552 voters
9 Sept 2025Paragraph 71 — part 2 Public procurementSplit vote457 for, 179 against, 5 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.88 553 voters
23 Oct 2025Separate vote on paragraph 3 UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)Separate vote383 for, 170 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.88 501 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
19 Jun 2025Paragraph 13 — part 2 Electricity grids: the backbone of the EU energy systemSplit vote403 for, 168 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.88 497 voters
9 Sept 2025Recital AH — part 2 of 2 Public procurementSplit vote448 for, 186 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.88 557 voters
9 Sept 2025Paragraph 58 — part 2 Public procurementSplit vote456 for, 187 against, 5 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.87 558 voters
19 Jun 2025Separate vote on citation 13 Electricity grids: the backbone of the EU energy systemSeparate vote397 for, 162 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.87 498 voters
23 Oct 2025Separate vote on paragraph 9 UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)Separate vote385 for, 178 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.87 500 voters
9 Sept 2025Paragraph 65 — part 2 Public procurementSplit vote444 for, 185 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by S&D, Patriotsr · shared0.87 549 voters
9 Sept 2025Paragraph 59 — part 2 Public procurementSplit vote448 for, 190 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.87 559 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187397
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Recital J — part 2 — Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing”. Vote, 10 March 2026. votingId 187397, reference 2025/2070(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187397 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-10/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-03-10-187397,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Recital J — part 2 — Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-10},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187397}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187397},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 187397, reference 2025/2070(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10 (CC BY 4.0)}
}