Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 55 — part 2

Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing

Vote
Paragraph 55 — part 2
Decision
No. 6 of the sitting of 10 Mar 2026
Result
432 for · 137 against · 41 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
10 March 2026, 13:54
More facts (6)
Position
vote 201 of 260 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots · split vote: Patriots
Official label
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 55/2
Text
Report A-10-2026-0025
Dossier
2025/2070(INI)
Vote id
187378
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 432 for, 137 against, 41 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 71 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “calls on the Commission to integrate gender-based violence considerations into EU housing policy;”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 38Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 46Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 120Against 0Abst. 0No vote 15 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 63Against 2Abst. 0No vote 11 of 76Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.95
EPPFor 152Against 1Abst. 3No vote 30 of 186Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
ECRFor 0Against 69Abst. 1No vote 9 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
PatriotsFor 0Against 38Abst. 28No vote 18 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.36
ESNFor 1Against 22Abst. 1No vote 4 of 28Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
No groupFor 12Against 5Abst. 8No vote 6 of 31Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Renew members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria200
Belgium500
Bulgaria300
Germany700
Denmark220
Estonia100
Spain100
Finland300
France1100
Ireland500
Italy100
Lithuania200
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Netherlands600
Portugal200
Romania100
Sweden300
Slovenia200
Slovakia400

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 610 members

No vote recorded, 108

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 108 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Sept 2025Recital AH — part 2 of 2 Public procurementSplit vote448 for, 186 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.93 547 voters
9 Sept 2025Separate vote on recital AA Public procurementSeparate vote430 for, 183 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.93 524 voters
20 May 2026Paragraph 1, point m — part 3 Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblySplit vote457 for, 153 against, 36 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.93 555 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
19 Jun 2025Recital R — part 3 Electricity grids: the backbone of the EU energy systemSplit vote396 for, 163 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.93 484 voters
9 Sept 2025Paragraph 86 — part 2 Public procurementSplit vote450 for, 183 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.93 543 voters
20 May 2026Paragraph 1, point aq — part 2 Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblySplit vote455 for, 152 against, 39 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.92 555 voters
9 Sept 2025Recital E — part 3 of 3 Public procurementSplit vote481 for, 157 against, 4 abstained Adopted For 75 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.92 543 voters
23 Oct 2025Separate vote on paragraph 3 UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)Separate vote383 for, 170 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.92 497 voters
20 May 2026Citation 5 — part 2 Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblySplit vote467 for, 151 against, 32 abstained Adopted For 72 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.92 560 voters
9 Sept 2025Paragraph 58 — part 2 Public procurementSplit vote456 for, 187 against, 5 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.92 549 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187378
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 55 — part 2 — Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing”. Vote, 10 March 2026. votingId 187378, reference 2025/2070(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187378 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-10/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-03-10-187378,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 55 — part 2 — Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-10},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187378}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187378},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 187378, reference 2025/2070(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10 (CC BY 4.0)}
}