Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 61 to paragraph 53

Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing

Vote
Amendment 61 to paragraph 53
Decision
No. 6 of the sitting of 10 Mar 2026
Result
281 for · 306 against · 31 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
10 March 2026, 13:53
More facts (6)
Position
vote 194 of 260 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: EPP
Official label
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 53 – Am 61
Text
Report A-10-2026-0025
Dossier
2025/2070(INI)
Vote id
187368
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 281 for, 306 against, 31 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 45 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 1Against 36Abst. 0No vote 9 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
GreensFor 3Against 43Abst. 0No vote 7 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.90
S&DFor 3Against 113Abst. 5No vote 14 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.90
RenewFor 18Against 49Abst. 2No vote 7 of 76Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.57
EPPFor 148Against 10Abst. 4No vote 24 of 186Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.87
ECRFor 53Against 10Abst. 4No vote 12 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.69
PatriotsFor 50Against 12Abst. 4No vote 18 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.64
ESNFor 0Against 19Abst. 5No vote 4 of 28Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.69
No groupFor 5Against 14Abst. 7No vote 5 of 31Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria020
Belgium010
Czechia010
Germany1130
Denmark030
Spain030
Finland020
France030
Croatia010
Italy120
Lithuania010
Luxembourg010
Latvia010
Netherlands150
Romania010
Sweden030

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 618 members

No vote recorded, 100

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 100 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
15 Sept 2026Amendment 3 to paragraph 55 Implementation of the Council Recommendation on a Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth GuaranteeAmendment332 for, 300 against, 23 abstained Adopted For 51 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.80 565 voters
20 Jan 2026Amendment 1 to recital A Just transition directive in the world of work: ensuring the creation of jobs and revitalising local economiesAmendment288 for, 294 against, 63 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.78 570 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 225 + 283 (voted as one) to recital 14 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment365 for, 271 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.77 557 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Amendments 239 + 299 (voted as one) to Article 3 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment362 for, 276 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.77 558 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 227 + 285 (voted as one) to recital 19 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment364 for, 269 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.76 553 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 241 + 301 (voted as one) to Article 3 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment364 for, 273 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by S&D, ESN, ECRr · shared0.76 557 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 236 + 295 + 296 (voted as one) to Article 2 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment365 for, 276 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by S&D, ESN, ECRr · shared0.76 560 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 226 + 284 (voted as one) to recital 18 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment363 for, 276 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.76 558 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 234 + 293 (voted as one) to Article 2 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment364 for, 275 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by S&D, ESN, ECRr · shared0.76 559 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 238 + 298 (voted as one) to Article 3 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment367 for, 272 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.76 559 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187368
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
26 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 61 to paragraph 53 — Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing”. Vote, 10 March 2026. votingId 187368, reference 2025/2070(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187368 (retrieved 26 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-10/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-03-10-187368,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 61 to paragraph 53 — Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-10},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187368}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187368},
  urldate = {2026-09-26},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 187368, reference 2025/2070(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10 (CC BY 4.0)}
}