Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 106 — part 2, after paragraph 50

Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing

Vote
Amendment 106 — part 2, after paragraph 50
Result
323 for · 247 against · 41 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
10 March 2026, 13:52
More facts (6)
Position
vote 191 of 260 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: EPP, S&D · split vote: ECR
Official label
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 50 – Am 106/2
Vote id
187365
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 323 for, 247 against, 41 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 53 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “those words”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 37Against 0Abst. 0No vote 9 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 47Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 116Against 0Abst. 5No vote 14 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
RenewFor 52Against 17Abst. 0No vote 7 of 76Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.63
EPPFor 39Against 117Abst. 2No vote 28 of 186Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.61
ECRFor 7Against 60Abst. 0No vote 12 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.84
PatriotsFor 7Against 29Abst. 28No vote 20 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.18
ESNFor 0Against 22Abst. 2No vote 4 of 28Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
No groupFor 18Against 2Abst. 4No vote 7 of 31Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria030
Czechia010
Germany0130
Hungary001
Italy010
Lithuania001
Poland020
Slovakia020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 611 members

No vote recorded, 107

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 107 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
11 Mar 2026Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 3 European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2026Amendment313 for, 270 against, 49 abstained Adopted For 50 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.90 591 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 12 Implementation of the Council Recommendation on a Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth GuaranteeAmendment336 for, 266 against, 63 abstained Adopted For 51 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.90 566 voters
12 Feb 2026Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 47 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategyAmendment291 for, 238 against, 50 abstained Adopted For 50 %Requested by EPP, Membersr · shared0.86 501 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Mar 2025Paragraph 24 — part 2 European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2025Split vote338 for, 278 against, 59 abstained Adopted For 50 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.86 567 voters
12 Mar 2025Paragraph 31 — part 4 European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2025Split vote339 for, 325 against, 17 abstained Adopted For 50 %r · shared0.85 572 voters
12 Feb 2026Amendment 6 to paragraph 31 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategyAmendment284 for, 281 against, 17 abstained Adopted For 49 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.83 504 voters
12 Mar 2025Paragraph 17 — part 3 European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2025Split vote317 for, 343 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 47 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.83 563 voters
21 May 2026Separate vote on paragraph 64 Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gapSeparate vote266 for, 234 against, 25 abstained Adopted For 51 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.82 456 voters
12 Mar 2025Paragraph 31 — part 3 European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2025Split vote311 for, 367 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 46 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.81 574 voters
11 Mar 2026Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 6 European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2026Amendment299 for, 293 against, 41 abstained Adopted For 47 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.81 590 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 106 — part 2, after paragraph 50 — Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing”. Vote, 10 March 2026. votingId 187365, reference 2025/2070(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187365 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-10/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-03-10-187365,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 106 — part 2, after paragraph 50 — Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-10},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187365}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187365},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 187365, reference 2025/2070(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10 (CC BY 4.0)}
}