Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 106 — part 1, after paragraph 50

Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing

Vote
Amendment 106 — part 1, after paragraph 50
Result
529 for · 72 against · 19 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
10 March 2026, 13:52
More facts (6)
Position
vote 190 of 260 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: EPP, S&D · split vote: ECR
Official label
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 50 – Am 106/1
Vote id
187364
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 529 for, 72 against, 19 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 85 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘reiterates, in this context, its call for a substantial dedicated budget of at least EUR 20 billion for the European Child Guarantee;’”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 38Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 47Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 121Against 0Abst. 0No vote 14 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 52Against 17Abst. 0No vote 7 of 76Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.63
EPPFor 155Against 6Abst. 0No vote 25 of 186Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
ECRFor 55Against 9Abst. 6No vote 9 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.68
PatriotsFor 45Against 15Abst. 6No vote 18 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.52
ESNFor 0Against 22Abst. 2No vote 4 of 28Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
No groupFor 16Against 3Abst. 5No vote 7 of 31Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Renew members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria200
Belgium410
Bulgaria300
Germany070
Denmark220
Estonia100
Spain100
Finland210
France1200
Ireland600
Italy100
Lithuania200
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Netherlands340
Portugal200
Romania200
Sweden120
Slovenia200
Slovakia400

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 620 members

No vote recorded, 98

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 98 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
28 Apr 2026Final vote on the provisional agreement European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: workers affected by imminent job displacementFinal566 for, 67 against, 26 abstained Adopted For 86 %r · shared0.81 579 voters
15 Sept 2026Final vote — text as a whole Implementation of the Council Recommendation on a Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth GuaranteeFinal530 for, 77 against, 61 abstained Adopted For 79 %r · shared0.77 577 voters
17 Sept 2026Final vote — text as a whole An EU health workforce crisis plan: sustainability of healthcare systems and employment and working conditions in the healthcare sectorFinal514 for, 61 against, 33 abstained Adopted For 85 %r · shared0.76 522 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Oct 2025Paragraph 4 — part 1 Second World Summit for Social DevelopmentSplit vote478 for, 69 against, 65 abstained Adopted For 78 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.73 533 voters
12 Feb 2026Separate vote on paragraph 1, point p Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSeparate vote470 for, 62 against, 28 abstained Adopted For 84 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.70 495 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 8 — part 1 Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rightsSplit vote470 for, 64 against, 46 abstained Adopted For 81 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.69 511 voters
9 Oct 2025Paragraph 13 — part 1 Second World Summit for Social DevelopmentSplit vote479 for, 68 against, 64 abstained Adopted For 78 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.68 532 voters
28 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 29 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034Separate vote562 for, 82 against, 12 abstained Adopted For 86 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.67 578 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 3 — part 2 World Cancer DaySplit vote443 for, 62 against, 44 abstained Adopted For 81 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.67 483 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 19 — part 1 Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rightsSplit vote447 for, 102 against, 30 abstained Adopted For 77 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.64 511 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 106 — part 1, after paragraph 50 — Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing”. Vote, 10 March 2026. votingId 187364, reference 2025/2070(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187364 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-10/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-03-10-187364,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 106 — part 1, after paragraph 50 — Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-10},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187364}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187364},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 187364, reference 2025/2070(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10 (CC BY 4.0)}
}