Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 48 — part 10

Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing

Vote
Paragraph 48 — part 10
Result
474 for · 123 against · 16 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
10 March 2026, 13:50
More facts (6)
Position
vote 182 of 260 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: EPP · split vote: Greens, Patriots
Official label
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 48/10
Vote id
187354
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 474 for, 123 against, 16 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 77 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: ‘underlining that housing projects that pass into private hands are also legitimate;’ ‘stresses that Member States should be free to choose how to manage these projects in line with their national policies;’

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 33Abst. 3No vote 10 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
GreensFor 0Against 46Abst. 1No vote 6 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 101Against 12Abst. 7No vote 15 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.76
RenewFor 69Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 76Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 158Against 2Abst. 0No vote 26 of 186Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
ECRFor 65Against 1Abst. 1No vote 12 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
PatriotsFor 65Against 1Abst. 0No vote 18 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
ESNFor 3Against 19Abst. 1No vote 5 of 28Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.74
No groupFor 13Against 9Abst. 3No vote 6 of 31Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria030
Czechia010
Germany0120
Hungary010
Italy100
Lithuania001
Poland020
Slovakia200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 613 members

No vote recorded, 105

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 105 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Sept 2025Amendment 371 to Annex VII, Part C, point 13 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment530 for, 112 against, 4 abstained Adopted For 82 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.84 552 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 120 to Article 19, after paragraph 1 (corresponds to Article 22 in am 120) — part 3 Generalised scheme of tariff preferencesAmendment502 for, 128 against, 16 abstained Adopted For 78 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.82 562 voters
21 Jan 2025Final vote on the draft Council decision EU/Republic of Serbia agreement on operational activities carried out by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency in the Republic of SerbiaFinal505 for, 90 against, 43 abstained Adopted For 79 %r · shared0.82 544 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
23 Jan 2025Paragraph 2 — part 1 Situation in Venezuela following the usurpation of the presidency on 10 January 2025Split vote480 for, 112 against, 16 abstained Adopted For 79 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.79 523 voters
9 Sept 2025Final vote on the draft Council decision EU-Kyrgyz Republic Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation AgreementFinal473 for, 114 against, 58 abstained Adopted For 73 %r · shared0.79 552 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 133 to Article 6 — part 2 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment512 for, 122 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 79 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.78 555 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 116 + 117 + 316 + 1 (voted as one) to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment536 for, 100 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 83 %Requested by ESN, ECRr · shared0.77 553 voters
23 Jan 2025Paragraph 5 — part 1 Situation in Venezuela following the usurpation of the presidency on 10 January 2025Split vote467 for, 116 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 77 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.76 519 voters
23 Oct 2024Amendment 156 Draft general budget of the European Union for 2025 – all sectionsAmendment519 for, 74 against, 57 abstained Adopted For 80 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.76 546 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 318 to Article 55, après le paragraph 2 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment512 for, 120 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 79 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.75 550 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 48 — part 10 — Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing”. Vote, 10 March 2026. votingId 187354, reference 2025/2070(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187354 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-10/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-03-10-187354,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 48 — part 10 — Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-10},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187354}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187354},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 187354, reference 2025/2070(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10 (CC BY 4.0)}
}