Amendment 46 to paragraph 41 · Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing · Vote

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Rejected · 16 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. **No vote**: in office that day, no position recorded. **Majority line**: the most common position. **Clear line**: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. **Cohesion**: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
Group	For	Against	Abst.	No vote	Majority line	Clear line	Cohesion
The Left	For 39	Against 0	Abst. 0	No vote 7 of 46	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 1.00
Greens	For 46	Against 0	Abst. 1	No vote 6 of 53	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 0.97
S&D	For 2	Against 121	Abst. 0	No vote 12 of 135	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.98
Renew	For 0	Against 69	Abst. 0	No vote 7 of 76	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 1.00
EPP	For 0	Against 160	Abst. 0	No vote 26 of 186	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 1.00
ECR	For 1	Against 69	Abst. 2	No vote 7 of 79	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.94
Patriots	For 0	Against 65	Abst. 1	No vote 18 of 84	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.98
ESN	For 0	Against 24	Abst. 1	No vote 3 of 28	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.94
No group	For 11	Against 8	Abst. 7	No vote 5 of 31	Majority line —	Clear line No line	Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Each cell: members of that country in that group who voted for – against – abstained (group at the date of the vote). Shading: the share of the cell's votes that were for; the stronger the shading, the more for (scale below). — : no member voted.
Country	The Left	Greens	S&D	Renew	EPP	ECR	Patriots	ESN	No group
Austria	no member voted	2–0–0	0–5–0	0–2–0	0–5–0	no member voted	0–6–0	no member voted	no member voted
Belgium	2–0–0	2–0–0	0–4–0	0–5–0	0–3–0	0–2–0	0–3–0	no member voted	no member voted
Bulgaria	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0	0–3–0	0–4–0	0–1–0	no member voted	0–3–0	0–1–0
Cyprus	1–0–0	no member voted	0–1–0	no member voted	0–1–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–0–1
Czechia	no member voted	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–5–0	0–3–0	0–7–0	0–1–0	2–1–0
Germany	4–0–0	14–0–0	0–12–0	0–7–0	0–28–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–13–0	5–2–0
Denmark	no member voted	3–0–0	0–3–0	0–4–0	0–2–0	0–1–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted
Estonia	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0	0–1–0	0–2–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Spain	2–0–0	3–0–0	0–15–0	0–1–0	0–18–0	0–1–0	0–4–0	no member voted	no member voted
Finland	3–0–0	2–0–0	0–2–0	0–3–0	0–4–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
France	6–0–0	3–0–0	0–13–0	0–12–0	0–5–0	0–4–0	0–20–1	no member voted	0–1–0
Greece	3–0–0	no member voted	0–3–0	no member voted	0–7–0	0–0–2	0–1–0	no member voted	1–0–3
Croatia	no member voted	1–0–0	0–4–0	no member voted	0–5–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Hungary	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	0–7–0	0–1–0	no member voted
Ireland	3–0–0	no member voted	0–1–0	0–6–0	0–3–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Italy	10–0–0	3–0–0	0–18–0	0–1–0	0–9–0	0–24–0	0–6–0	0–0–1	no member voted
Lithuania	no member voted	1–0–0	0–2–0	0–2–0	0–2–0	0–2–0	no member voted	0–1–0	no member voted
Luxembourg	no member voted	1–0–0	0–1–0	0–1–0	0–2–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	0–1–0
Latvia	no member voted	0–0–1	0–1–0	0–1–0	0–2–0	0–3–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted
Malta	no member voted	no member voted	0–3–0	no member voted	0–2–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Netherlands	1–0–0	6–0–0	0–4–0	0–7–0	0–6–0	0–1–0	0–5–0	no member voted	no member voted
Poland	no member voted	no member voted	0–3–0	no member voted	0–19–0	1–17–0	0–2–0	0–3–0	0–0–1
Portugal	2–0–0	no member voted	1–7–0	0–2–0	0–7–0	no member voted	0–2–0	no member voted	no member voted
Romania	no member voted	1–0–0	1–8–0	0–2–0	0–9–0	0–5–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–1–0
Sweden	2–0–0	3–0–0	0–4–0	0–3–0	0–4–0	0–3–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Slovenia	no member voted	no member voted	0–1–0	0–2–0	0–5–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Slovakia	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	0–4–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0	3–1–2

Share for: 0–19 %20–39 %40–59 %60–79 %80–100 %

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
Country	For	Against	Abst.
Bulgaria	0	1	0
Cyprus	0	0	1
Czechia	2	1	0
Germany	5	2	0
France	0	1	0
Greece	1	0	3
Luxembourg	0	1	0
Poland	0	0	1
Romania	0	1	0
Slovakia	3	1	2

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 627 members

No vote recorded, 91

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 91 members

Name · group that day · country

Adam JARUBAS group that day: EPP · Poland
Adrián VÁZQUEZ LÁZARA group that day: EPP · Spain
Aldo PATRICIELLO group that day: Patriots · Italy
Aleksandar NIKOLIC group that day: Patriots · France
Alice TEODORESCU MÅWE group that day: EPP · Sweden
Alicia HOMS GINEL group that day: S&D · Spain
Alma EZCURRA ALMANSA group that day: EPP · Spain
Alvise PÉREZ group that day: No group · Spain
Ana MIRANDA PAZ group that day: Greens · Spain
András GYÜRK group that day: Patriots · Hungary
András Tivadar KULJA group that day: EPP · Hungary
Anja ARNDT group that day: ESN · Germany
Annamária VICSEK group that day: Patriots · Hungary
Anne-Sophie FRIGOUT group that day: Patriots · France
Anthony SMITH group that day: The Left · France
Arash SAEIDI group that day: The Left · France
Assita KANKO group that day: ECR · Belgium
Borys BUDKA group that day: EPP · Poland
Christophe GRUDLER group that day: Renew · France
Claudiu MANDA group that day: S&D · Romania
Damien CARÊME group that day: The Left · France
Dan-Ştefan MOTREANU group that day: EPP · Romania
David MCALLISTER group that day: EPP · Germany
Diana IOVANOVICI ŞOŞOACĂ group that day: No group · Romania
Dóra DÁVID group that day: EPP · Hungary
Elena YONCHEVA group that day: No group · Bulgaria
Esteban GONZÁLEZ PONS group that day: EPP · Spain
Estrella GALÁN group that day: The Left · Spain
Eszter LAKOS group that day: EPP · Hungary
Eva MAYDELL group that day: EPP · Bulgaria
France JAMET group that day: Patriots · France
Gabriel MATO group that day: EPP · Spain
Gabriella GERZSENYI group that day: EPP · Hungary
Hanna GRONKIEWICZ-WALTZ group that day: EPP · Poland
Heléne FRITZON group that day: S&D · Sweden
Hermann TERTSCH group that day: Patriots · Spain
Hildegard BENTELE group that day: EPP · Germany
Ignazio Roberto MARINO group that day: Greens · Italy
Ilia LAZAROV group that day: EPP · Bulgaria
Jaak MADISON group that day: ECR · Estonia
Jan-Peter WARNKE group that day: No group · Germany
Jana TOOM group that day: Renew · Estonia
Jaroslav KNOT group that day: Patriots · Czechia
Joachim STREIT group that day: Renew · Germany
Jorge MARTÍN FRÍAS group that day: Patriots · Spain
José CEPEDA group that day: S&D · Spain
Julie RECHAGNEUX group that day: Patriots · France
Katarina BARLEY group that day: S&D · Germany
Kinga GÁL group that day: Patriots · Hungary
Kinga KOLLÁR group that day: EPP · Hungary
Laura BALLARÍN CEREZA group that day: S&D · Spain
Laurent CASTILLO group that day: Patriots · France
Lina GÁLVEZ group that day: S&D · Spain
Loucas FOURLAS group that day: EPP · Cyprus
Ľubica KARVAŠOVÁ group that day: Renew · Slovakia
Majdouline SBAI group that day: Greens · France
Marc JONGEN group that day: ESN · Germany
Marco TARQUINIO group that day: S&D · Italy
Maria WALSH group that day: EPP · Ireland
Marie DAUCHY group that day: Patriots · France
Marta WCISŁO group that day: EPP · Poland
Matthias ECKE group that day: S&D · Germany
Mélissa CAMARA group that day: Greens · France
Michael VON DER SCHULENBURG group that day: No group · Germany
Michał KOBOSKO group that day: Renew · Poland
Nicolás GONZÁLEZ CASARES group that day: S&D · Spain
Nikolas FARANTOURIS group that day: The Left · Greece
Nora JUNCO GARCÍA group that day: ECR · Spain
Pál SZEKERES group that day: Patriots · Hungary
Pascale PIERA group that day: Patriots · France
Patryk JAKI group that day: ECR · Poland
Per CLAUSEN group that day: The Left · Denmark
Pernando BARRENA ARZA group that day: The Left · Spain
Péter MAGYAR group that day: EPP · Hungary
Rasa JUKNEVIČIENĖ group that day: EPP · Lithuania
Roberta METSOLA group that day: EPP · Malta
Rody TOLASSY group that day: Patriots · France
Sandro RUOTOLO group that day: S&D · Italy
Sarah KNAFO group that day: ESN · France
Sebastian KRUIS group that day: Patriots · Netherlands
Şerban Dimitrie STURDZA group that day: ECR · Romania
Sergey LAGODINSKY group that day: Greens · Germany
Séverine WERBROUCK group that day: Patriots · France
Ştefan MUŞOIU group that day: S&D · Romania
Stephen Nikola BARTULICA group that day: ECR · Croatia
Tobiasz BOCHEŃSKI group that day: ECR · Poland
Veronika CIFROVÁ OSTRIHOŇOVÁ group that day: Renew · Slovakia
Vlad VASILE-VOICULESCU group that day: Renew · Romania
Vladimir PREBILIČ group that day: Greens · Slovenia
Željana ZOVKO group that day: EPP · Croatia
Zoltán TARR group that day: EPP · Hungary

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

**Result**: for–against–abstained. **For**: share of the votes cast. **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call.
Date	Vote	Kind	Result	For	Requested by	r · shared
17 Sept 2026	Amendment 65 to paragraph 7 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders	Amendment	91 for, 503 against, 9 abstained Rejected	For 15 %	Requested by The Left	r · shared0.93 524 voters
17 Sept 2026	Amendment 56 to recital D The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders	Amendment	89 for, 494 against, 3 abstained Rejected	For 15 %	Requested by The Left	r · shared0.93 511 voters
8 Jul 2026	Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 37 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)	Amendment	107 for, 538 against, 16 abstained Rejected	For 16 %	Requested by The Left	r · shared0.93 583 voters

Show 7 more

**Result**: for–against–abstained. **For**: share of the votes cast. **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call.
Date	Vote	Kind	Result	For	Requested by	r · shared
9 Oct 2025	Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 8 Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2024	Amendment	101 for, 501 against, 9 abstained Rejected	For 17 %	Requested by Greens	r · shared0.93 539 voters
9 Oct 2025	Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 4 Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2024	Amendment	104 for, 495 against, 16 abstained Rejected	For 17 %	Requested by Greens	r · shared0.92 542 voters
8 Jul 2026	Amendment 26 to paragraph 38 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)	Amendment	100 for, 551 against, 15 abstained Rejected	For 15 %	Requested by The Left	r · shared0.92 586 voters
17 Sept 2026	Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 13 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders	Amendment	93 for, 493 against, 5 abstained Rejected	For 16 %	Requested by The Left	r · shared0.92 513 voters
28 Apr 2026	Amendment 124 to Article 19, After paragraph 1 (corresponds to Article 22 in am 120) Generalised scheme of tariff preferences	Amendment	95 for, 551 against, 9 abstained Rejected	For 15 %	Requested by The Left	r · shared0.91 582 voters
28 Apr 2026	Amendment 45, adding text after paragraph 1 Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section III	Amendment	99 for, 547 against, 11 abstained Rejected	For 15 %	Requested by The Left	r · shared0.91 585 voters
8 Jul 2026	Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 5 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)	Amendment	108 for, 548 against, 9 abstained Rejected	For 16 %	Requested by The Left	r · shared0.91 585 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Another vote on this decision

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Decision Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Resolution · report by Borja Giménez Larraz 10 Mar 2026 Adopted

Other votes on this decision

Vote Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing — Amendment 24, adding text before paragraph 1 Roll-call vote · 10 Mar 2026 10 Mar 2026
Vote Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing — Amendment 63, adding text before paragraph 1 Roll-call vote · 10 Mar 2026 10 Mar 2026
Vote Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing — Paragraph 3 — part 1 Roll-call vote · 10 Mar 2026 10 Mar 2026
Vote Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing — Amendment 64, adding text after paragraph 3 Roll-call vote · 10 Mar 2026 10 Mar 2026
Vote Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing — Amendment 65, adding text after paragraph 3 Roll-call vote · 10 Mar 2026 10 Mar 2026
Vote Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing — Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 3 Roll-call vote · 10 Mar 2026 10 Mar 2026
Vote Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing — Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 3 Roll-call vote · 10 Mar 2026 10 Mar 2026
Vote Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing — Paragraph 4 — part 2 Roll-call vote · 10 Mar 2026 10 Mar 2026
Vote Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing — Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 4 Roll-call vote · 10 Mar 2026 10 Mar 2026
Vote Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing — Amendment 96, adding text after paragraph 4 Roll-call vote · 10 Mar 2026 10 Mar 2026

See all

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187307
Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament)
Results of votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament)
Data source: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 46 to paragraph 41 — Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing”. Vote, 10 March 2026. votingId 187307, reference 2025/2070(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187307 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-10/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).

BibTeX

@misc{epw-vote-2026-03-10-187307,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 46 to paragraph 41 — Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-10},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187307}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187307},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 187307, reference 2025/2070(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10 (CC BY 4.0)}
}