Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 38, after paragraph 29

Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing

Vote
Amendment 38, after paragraph 29
Result
107 for · 488 against · 24 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
10 March 2026, 13:37
More facts (6)
Position
vote 101 of 260 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left, ECR
Official label
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 29 – Am 38
Vote id
187266
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 107 for, 488 against, 24 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 17 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 28Against 8Abst. 2No vote 8 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.61
GreensFor 43Against 0Abst. 4No vote 6 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.87
S&DFor 18Against 98Abst. 5No vote 14 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.71
RenewFor 0Against 68Abst. 0No vote 8 of 76Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 0Against 160Abst. 0No vote 26 of 186Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 3Against 66Abst. 0No vote 10 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
PatriotsFor 0Against 60Abst. 6No vote 18 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.86
ESNFor 0Against 21Abst. 3No vote 4 of 28Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.81
No groupFor 15Against 7Abst. 4No vote 5 of 31Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria200
Belgium200
Czechia100
Germany1400
Denmark201
Spain300
Finland200
France300
Croatia100
Italy300
Lithuania100
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Netherlands600
Romania100
Sweden003

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 619 members

No vote recorded, 99

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 99 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 Jul 2026Amendment 33 to paragraph 49 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)Amendment114 for, 539 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 17 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.83 578 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 32 to paragraph 48 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)Amendment131 for, 520 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 20 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.83 575 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 31, adding text after paragraph 45 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)Amendment118 for, 518 against, 23 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.82 572 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 Jul 2026Amendment 17, adding text after recital M EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)Amendment129 for, 529 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 19 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.82 580 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 18 to paragraph 5 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)Amendment122 for, 534 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.82 581 voters
7 Jul 2026Amendment 1 to recital D Special Committee on the Housing Crisis in the European Union: extending its term of office and adjusting its responsibilitiesAmendment130 for, 490 against, 35 abstained Rejected For 20 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.81 570 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 34 to paragraph 50 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)Amendment110 for, 549 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 16 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.81 582 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 16, adding text after recital J EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)Amendment118 for, 538 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.81 579 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 30 to paragraph 45 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)Amendment119 for, 503 against, 41 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.80 575 voters
27 Nov 2025Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 9 Escalation of the war and the humanitarian catastrophe in SudanAmendment94 for, 475 against, 19 abstained Rejected For 16 %r · shared0.80 520 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 38, after paragraph 29 — Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing”. Vote, 10 March 2026. votingId 187266, reference 2025/2070(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187266 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-10/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-03-10-187266,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 38, after paragraph 29 — Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-10},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187266}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187266},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 187266, reference 2025/2070(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10 (CC BY 4.0)}
}