Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 29 — part 2

Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing

Vote
Paragraph 29 — part 2
Decision
No. 6 of the sitting of 10 Mar 2026
Result
506 for · 88 against · 27 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
10 March 2026, 13:36
More facts (6)
Position
vote 95 of 260 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: EPP, S&D · split vote: Patriots
Official label
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 29/2
Text
Report A-10-2026-0025
Dossier
2025/2070(INI)
Vote id
187260
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 506 for, 88 against, 27 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 81 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “long-term and”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 39Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 46Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 122Against 0Abst. 0No vote 13 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 66Against 0Abst. 3No vote 7 of 76Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
EPPFor 158Against 1Abst. 1No vote 26 of 186Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
ECRFor 57Against 11Abst. 2No vote 9 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.72
PatriotsFor 0Against 48Abst. 16No vote 20 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.63
ESNFor 0Against 24Abst. 1No vote 3 of 28Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 18Against 4Abst. 4No vote 5 of 31Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria100
Cyprus010
Czechia300
Germany601
France100
Greece400
Luxembourg010
Poland001
Romania100
Slovakia222

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 621 members

No vote recorded, 97

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 97 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 4 — part 1 Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rightsSplit vote467 for, 100 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 80 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.91 513 voters
8 Jul 2025Paragraph 49 — part 3 Security of energy supply in the EUSplit vote535 for, 122 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 80 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.89 577 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 133 to Article 6 — part 1 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment505 for, 126 against, 19 abstained Adopted For 78 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.89 560 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
7 May 2025Final vote Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Court of Justice of the European UnionFinal541 for, 97 against, 26 abstained Adopted For 81 %r · shared0.88 569 voters
30 Apr 2026Paragraph 6 — part 2 Supporting democratic resilience in ArmeniaSplit vote458 for, 88 against, 22 abstained Adopted For 81 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.88 495 voters
12 Mar 2025Paragraph 17 — part 1 European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2025Split vote544 for, 109 against, 25 abstained Adopted For 80 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.88 579 voters
9 Sept 2025Paragraph 3 — part 2 Public procurementSplit vote497 for, 126 against, 23 abstained Adopted For 77 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.87 557 voters
19 Dec 2024Paragraph 1, point a — part 1 Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote464 for, 99 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 81 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.87 502 voters
7 May 2025Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2023: AgenciesFinal503 for, 121 against, 26 abstained Adopted For 77 %r · shared0.86 557 voters
7 May 2025Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European Council and CouncilFinal526 for, 119 against, 20 abstained Adopted For 79 %r · shared0.86 570 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187260
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 29 — part 2 — Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing”. Vote, 10 March 2026. votingId 187260, reference 2025/2070(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187260 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-10/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-03-10-187260,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 29 — part 2 — Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-10},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187260}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187260},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 187260, reference 2025/2070(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10 (CC BY 4.0)}
}