Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 21 — part 4

Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing

Vote
Paragraph 21 — part 4
Decision
No. 6 of the sitting of 10 Mar 2026
Result
487 for · 125 against · 10 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
10 March 2026, 13:30
More facts (6)
Position
vote 68 of 260 on the decision
Requested by
split vote: Greens, The Left
Official label
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 21/4
Text
Report A-10-2026-0025
Dossier
2025/2070(INI)
Vote id
187232
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 487 for, 125 against, 10 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 78 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “warns about the possible consequences of such labelling; acknowledges that the practical implementation of the Energy Efficiency Directive affects many construction companies and private owners;”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 37Abst. 0No vote 9 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 46Abst. 0No vote 7 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 100Against 18Abst. 4No vote 13 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.73
RenewFor 69Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 76Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 158Against 1Abst. 1No vote 26 of 186Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
ECRFor 73Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 65Against 0Abst. 0No vote 19 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 4Against 20Abst. 1No vote 3 of 28Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.70
No groupFor 18Against 3Abst. 4No vote 6 of 31Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Renew members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria200
Belgium500
Bulgaria300
Germany700
Denmark400
Estonia100
Spain100
Finland300
France1200
Ireland600
Italy100
Lithuania200
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Netherlands700
Portugal200
Romania200
Sweden300
Slovenia200
Slovakia400

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 622 members

No vote recorded, 96

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 96 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Sept 2025Amendment 371 to Annex VII, Part C, point 13 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment530 for, 112 against, 4 abstained Adopted For 82 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.83 559 voters
21 Jan 2025Final vote on the draft Council decision EU/Republic of Serbia agreement on operational activities carried out by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency in the Republic of SerbiaFinal505 for, 90 against, 43 abstained Adopted For 79 %r · shared0.82 557 voters
23 Oct 2024Paragraph 63 — part 9 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2025 – all sectionsSplit vote506 for, 111 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 80 %r · shared0.82 545 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
28 Apr 2026Amendment 120 to Article 19, after paragraph 1 (corresponds to Article 22 in am 120) — part 3 Generalised scheme of tariff preferencesAmendment502 for, 128 against, 16 abstained Adopted For 78 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.81 571 voters
10 Sept 2025Final vote on the draft Council decision EC-Pacific States Interim Partnership Agreement: accession of VanuatuFinal528 for, 89 against, 48 abstained Adopted For 79 %r · shared0.80 574 voters
18 May 2026Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the ECR Group — Attack against citizens in Modena Final vote Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the ECR Group – Attack against citizens in ModenaOther355 for, 86 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 79 %r · shared0.80 390 voters
22 May 2025Final vote Amendments to the Capital Requirements Regulation as regards securities financing transactions under the net stable funding ratioFinal436 for, 149 against, 11 abstained Adopted For 73 %r · shared0.79 512 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 133 to Article 6 — part 2 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment512 for, 122 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 79 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.79 563 voters
12 Mar 2026Final vote Calculation of emission credits for heavy-duty vehicles for the reporting periods of the years 2025 to 2029Final473 for, 81 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 84 %r · shared0.78 527 voters
23 Oct 2024Amendment 156 Draft general budget of the European Union for 2025 – all sectionsAmendment519 for, 74 against, 57 abstained Adopted For 80 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.78 555 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187232
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 21 — part 4 — Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing”. Vote, 10 March 2026. votingId 187232, reference 2025/2070(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187232 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-10/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-03-10-187232,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 21 — part 4 — Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-10},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187232}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187232},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 187232, reference 2025/2070(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10 (CC BY 4.0)}
}