Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 21 — part 2

Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing

Vote
Paragraph 21 — part 2
Decision
No. 6 of the sitting of 10 Mar 2026
Result
493 for · 114 against · 8 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
10 March 2026, 13:30
More facts (6)
Position
vote 66 of 260 on the decision
Requested by
split vote: Greens, The Left
Official label
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 21/2
Text
Report A-10-2026-0025
Dossier
2025/2070(INI)
Vote id
187230
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 493 for, 114 against, 8 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 80 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “acknowledges that the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive imposes building requirements that could affect construction costs;”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 2Against 34Abst. 1No vote 9 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
GreensFor 0Against 45Abst. 0No vote 8 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 103Against 15Abst. 4No vote 13 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.77
RenewFor 68Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 76Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 158Against 1Abst. 0No vote 27 of 186Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 70Against 0Abst. 0No vote 9 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 65Against 0Abst. 0No vote 19 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 4Against 18Abst. 2No vote 4 of 28Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.63
No groupFor 23Against 1Abst. 1No vote 6 of 31Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

S&D members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria500
Belgium310
Bulgaria200
Cyprus100
Germany1100
Denmark300
Estonia200
Spain1500
Finland200
France0130
Greece300
Croatia004
Hungary200
Ireland100
Italy1800
Lithuania200
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Malta300
Netherlands400
Poland300
Portugal710
Romania900
Sweden400
Slovenia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 615 members

No vote recorded, 103

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 103 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Sept 2025Amendment 371 to Annex VII, Part C, point 13 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment530 for, 112 against, 4 abstained Adopted For 82 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.84 552 voters
21 Jan 2025Final vote on the draft Council decision EU/Republic of Serbia agreement on operational activities carried out by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency in the Republic of SerbiaFinal505 for, 90 against, 43 abstained Adopted For 79 %r · shared0.81 548 voters
23 Oct 2024Paragraph 63 — part 9 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2025 – all sectionsSplit vote506 for, 111 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 80 %r · shared0.81 538 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
28 Apr 2026Amendment 120 to Article 19, after paragraph 1 (corresponds to Article 22 in am 120) — part 3 Generalised scheme of tariff preferencesAmendment502 for, 128 against, 16 abstained Adopted For 78 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.81 564 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 133 to Article 6 — part 2 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment512 for, 122 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 79 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.79 556 voters
10 Sept 2025Final vote on the draft Council decision EC-Pacific States Interim Partnership Agreement: accession of VanuatuFinal528 for, 89 against, 48 abstained Adopted For 79 %r · shared0.78 567 voters
12 Mar 2026Final vote Calculation of emission credits for heavy-duty vehicles for the reporting periods of the years 2025 to 2029Final473 for, 81 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 84 %r · shared0.77 520 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 318 to Article 55, après le paragraph 2 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment512 for, 120 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 79 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.77 551 voters
18 May 2026Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the ECR Group — Attack against citizens in Modena Final vote Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the ECR Group – Attack against citizens in ModenaOther355 for, 86 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 79 %r · shared0.77 387 voters
22 May 2025Final vote Amendments to the Capital Requirements Regulation as regards securities financing transactions under the net stable funding ratioFinal436 for, 149 against, 11 abstained Adopted For 73 %r · shared0.76 505 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187230
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 21 — part 2 — Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing”. Vote, 10 March 2026. votingId 187230, reference 2025/2070(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187230 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-10/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-03-10-187230,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 21 — part 2 — Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-10},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187230}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187230},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 187230, reference 2025/2070(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10 (CC BY 4.0)}
}