Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 59 — part 2 to paragraph 21

Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing

Vote
Amendment 59 — part 2 to paragraph 21
Decision
No. 6 of the sitting of 10 Mar 2026
Result
189 for · 400 against · 23 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
10 March 2026, 13:29
More facts (6)
Position
vote 63 of 260 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ESN · split vote: ESN
Official label
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 21 – Am 59/2
Text
Report A-10-2026-0025
Dossier
2025/2070(INI)
Vote id
187227
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 189 for, 400 against, 23 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 31 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “which, through mandatory renovations, imposes unrealistic financial burdens on homeowners ranging from EUR 15 000 to EUR 100 000 per building; stresses that mandating the zero-emission building standard drastically increases construction costs and discourages new investment, which is extremely irresponsible in the face of the housing crisis; maintains that owners and the free market must determine the pace of property modernisation;”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 36Abst. 0No vote 10 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 46Abst. 0No vote 7 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 119Abst. 0No vote 16 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 67Abst. 0No vote 9 of 76Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 23Against 126Abst. 9No vote 28 of 186Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.70
ECRFor 71Against 0Abst. 1No vote 7 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
PatriotsFor 57Against 0Abst. 7No vote 20 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.84
ESNFor 24Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 28Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 14Against 6Abst. 6No vote 5 of 31Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria300
Czechia100
Germany1300
Hungary100
Italy100
Poland300
Slovakia200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 612 members

No vote recorded, 106

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 106 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
23 Oct 2025Final vote on motion B10-0457/2025 Specifying a methodology for assessing greenhouse gas emissions savings from low-carbon fuelsFinal180 for, 373 against, 20 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Greens, Patriotsr · shared0.95 496 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 50 to Article 1 Framework for achieving climate neutralityAmendment220 for, 415 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by Greens, S&D, Renewr · shared0.94 553 voters
26 Mar 2026Amendment 92 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)Amendment220 for, 406 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.94 551 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
23 Oct 2025Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 1 UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)Amendment204 for, 360 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 36 %Requested by Greens, Patriotsr · shared0.94 497 voters
18 Jun 2026Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 4 — part 1 Deteriorating situation of political prisoners in Belarus, in particular the case of Aliaksandra PulinovichAmendment177 for, 369 against, 17 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.94 492 voters
10 Sept 2025Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 8 Future of agriculture and the post-2027 common agricultural policyAmendment219 for, 420 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 34 %r · shared0.94 552 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 51 to Article 1 Framework for achieving climate neutralityAmendment217 for, 416 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by Greens, Renewr · shared0.94 551 voters
3 Apr 2025Amendment 20, adding text after paragraph 1 Energy-intensive industriesAmendment209 for, 386 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.93 511 voters
8 Jul 2025Amendment 8 to paragraph 15 Security of energy supply in the EUAmendment200 for, 424 against, 42 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Greens, Membersr · shared0.93 567 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 60 to recital 6 Framework for achieving climate neutralityAmendment220 for, 413 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by ECR, S&D, Renewr · shared0.93 549 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187227
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 59 — part 2 to paragraph 21 — Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing”. Vote, 10 March 2026. votingId 187227, reference 2025/2070(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187227 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-10/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-03-10-187227,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 59 — part 2 to paragraph 21 — Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-10},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187227}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187227},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 187227, reference 2025/2070(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10 (CC BY 4.0)}
}