Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 71, after paragraph 20

Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing

Vote
Amendment 71, after paragraph 20
Result
117 for · 498 against · 7 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
10 March 2026, 13:28
More facts (6)
Position
vote 58 of 260 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ECR, Greens
Official label
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 20 – Am 71
Vote id
187221
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 117 for, 498 against, 7 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 19 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 38Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 46Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 24Against 93Abst. 3No vote 15 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.66
RenewFor 0Against 69Abst. 0No vote 7 of 76Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 2Against 157Abst. 1No vote 26 of 186Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
ECRFor 0Against 73Abst. 0No vote 6 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 0Against 66Abst. 0No vote 18 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 25Abst. 0No vote 3 of 28Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 7Against 15Abst. 3No vote 6 of 31Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Renew members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria020
Belgium050
Bulgaria030
Germany070
Denmark040
Estonia010
Spain010
Finland030
France0120
Ireland060
Italy010
Lithuania020
Luxembourg010
Latvia010
Netherlands070
Portugal020
Romania020
Sweden030
Slovenia020
Slovakia040

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 622 members

No vote recorded, 96

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 96 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 Jul 2026Amendment 3 to paragraph 51 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)Amendment121 for, 533 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.93 575 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 34 to paragraph 50 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)Amendment110 for, 549 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 16 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.91 584 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 1 to paragraph 45 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)Amendment117 for, 536 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.90 580 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Oct 2025Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 7 Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2024Amendment101 for, 497 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 17 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.88 532 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 33 to paragraph 49 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)Amendment114 for, 539 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 17 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.87 580 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 16, adding text after recital J EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)Amendment118 for, 538 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.87 581 voters
12 Mar 2026Amendment 4 to Annex, point a Calculation of emission credits for heavy-duty vehicles for the reporting periods of the years 2025 to 2029Amendment81 for, 468 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.87 523 voters
12 Mar 2026Amendment 5 to Annex, point b Calculation of emission credits for heavy-duty vehicles for the reporting periods of the years 2025 to 2029Amendment81 for, 466 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.86 522 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 390 to Article 55, après le paragraph 2 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment105 for, 538 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 16 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.86 558 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 23 2025 Commission report on UkraineAmendment113 for, 549 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 17 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.86 583 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
26 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 71, after paragraph 20 — Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing”. Vote, 10 March 2026. votingId 187221, reference 2025/2070(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187221 (retrieved 26 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-10/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-03-10-187221,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 71, after paragraph 20 — Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-10},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187221}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187221},
  urldate = {2026-09-26},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 187221, reference 2025/2070(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10 (CC BY 4.0)}
}