Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 16 — part 1

Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing

Vote
Paragraph 16 — part 1
Result
577 for · 44 against · 7 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
10 March 2026, 13:25
More facts (6)
Position
vote 42 of 260 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: EPP · split vote: Greens, ECR
Official label
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 16/1
Vote id
187201
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 577 for, 44 against, 7 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 92 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘including through measures such as introducing the principle of positive administrative silence for the issuance of building permits for new construction and renovation works,’, ‘calls on the Commission to urge the Member States to set out a goal to achieve housing permits within a deadline of 60 days to deliver decent, sustainable and affordable housing;’ ‘calls on the Member States to promote the delivery of housing’ and ‘priority’ and ‘allowing shorter procedures to be activated at national level and to introduce fast-track approval procedures’”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 38Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 46Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 121Against 1Abst. 0No vote 13 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 67Against 2Abst. 0No vote 7 of 76Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
EPPFor 163Against 0Abst. 0No vote 23 of 186Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 68Against 5Abst. 0No vote 6 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.90
PatriotsFor 54Against 12Abst. 0No vote 18 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.73
ESNFor 1Against 22Abst. 2No vote 3 of 28Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.82
No groupFor 19Against 2Abst. 5No vote 5 of 31Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria030
Czechia100
Germany0130
Hungary010
Italy001
Lithuania001
Poland030
Slovakia020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 628 members

No vote recorded, 90

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 90 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

The minority on this vote was under 10 % of the votes cast — too small to compare how it split the chamber.

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 16 — part 1 — Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing”. Vote, 10 March 2026. votingId 187201, reference 2025/2070(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187201 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-10/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-03-10-187201,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 16 — part 1 — Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-10},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187201}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187201},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 187201, reference 2025/2070(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10 (CC BY 4.0)}
}