Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 13 — part 4

Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing

Vote
Paragraph 13 — part 4
Result
462 for · 101 against · 63 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
10 March 2026, 13:24
More facts (6)
Position
vote 36 of 260 on the decision
Requested by
split vote: ECR, Patriots
Official label
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 13/4
Vote id
187194
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 462 for, 101 against, 63 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 74 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “to ensure social cohesion and prevent socio-economic segregation and market-distorting practices;”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 38Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 45Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 122Against 0Abst. 0No vote 13 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 67Against 2Abst. 0No vote 7 of 76Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
EPPFor 162Against 0Abst. 1No vote 23 of 186Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 2Against 51Abst. 20No vote 6 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.55
PatriotsFor 6Against 22Abst. 38No vote 18 of 84Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.36
ESNFor 1Against 23Abst. 1No vote 3 of 28Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
No groupFor 19Against 3Abst. 3No vote 6 of 31Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria200
Belgium100
Czechia100
Germany1400
Denmark300
Spain300
Finland200
France300
Croatia100
Italy300
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Netherlands600
Romania100
Sweden300

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 626 members

No vote recorded, 92

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 92 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
22 Jan 2026Recital J — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote422 for, 107 against, 73 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.88 535 voters
19 Jun 2025Recital R — part 3 Electricity grids: the backbone of the EU energy systemSplit vote396 for, 163 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.87 498 voters
19 Jun 2025Recital R — part 2 Electricity grids: the backbone of the EU energy systemSplit vote405 for, 166 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.87 501 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
7 May 2025Paragraph 18 — part 3 Discharge 2023: European Public Prosecutor’s OfficeSplit vote458 for, 154 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 72 %r · shared0.87 547 voters
26 Nov 2025Paragraph 25 — part 2 Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and materialSplit vote467 for, 190 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 70 %r · shared0.87 588 voters
22 Jan 2026Recital Q — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote421 for, 150 against, 35 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.86 540 voters
11 Mar 2026Paragraph 24 — part 2 European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026Split vote444 for, 176 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.86 601 voters
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on recital AQ Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Separate vote423 for, 185 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.86 557 voters
1 Apr 2025Final vote Re-attribution of scientific and technical tasks and improving cooperation among Union agencies in the area of chemicalsFinal486 for, 171 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 72 %r · shared0.86 586 voters
19 Jun 2025Paragraph 13 — part 2 Electricity grids: the backbone of the EU energy systemSplit vote403 for, 168 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.86 502 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 13 — part 4 — Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing”. Vote, 10 March 2026. votingId 187194, reference 2025/2070(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187194 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-10/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-03-10-187194,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 13 — part 4 — Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-10},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187194}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187194},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 187194, reference 2025/2070(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10 (CC BY 4.0)}
}