Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 13 — part 2

Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing

Vote
Paragraph 13 — part 2
Result
443 for · 87 against · 96 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
10 March 2026, 13:24
More facts (6)
Position
vote 34 of 260 on the decision
Requested by
split vote: ECR, Patriots
Official label
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 13/2
Vote id
187192
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 443 for, 87 against, 96 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 71 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “urges competent public authorities to mobilise publicly owned land, review land zoning regulations and reclassify infrastructure-ready land for immediate development, to fast-track the delivery of affordable housing and cooperative, social and non-profit models; highlights that any land-use strategy must balance housing needs with high-quality construction standards;”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 6Against 12Abst. 19No vote 9 of 46Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.27
GreensFor 46Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 122Against 1Abst. 0No vote 12 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 66Against 2Abst. 1No vote 7 of 76Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
EPPFor 159Against 1Abst. 1No vote 25 of 186Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
ECRFor 6Against 12Abst. 54No vote 7 of 79Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.63
PatriotsFor 18Against 37Abst. 11No vote 18 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.34
ESNFor 0Against 22Abst. 3No vote 3 of 28Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.82
No groupFor 20Against 0Abst. 7No vote 4 of 31Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria030
Czechia001
Germany0130
Hungary001
Italy010
Lithuania001
Poland030
Slovakia020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 626 members

No vote recorded, 92

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 92 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 May 2025Final vote — text as a whole Competition policy – annual report 2024Final358 for, 124 against, 79 abstained Adopted For 64 %r · shared0.79 488 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 123 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment376 for, 195 against, 2 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.78 498 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 102 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment414 for, 215 against, 8 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.78 560 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 May 2025Amendment 116 to Article 7, paragraph 9 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment369 for, 199 against, 8 abstained Adopted For 64 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.78 500 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 122 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment378 for, 191 against, 2 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.77 495 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 118 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment371 for, 194 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.77 495 voters
24 Nov 2025Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the PPE, S&D, Renew and Verts/ALE groups — Ukraine (resolution) Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the PPE, S&D, Renew and Verts/ALE groups – Ukraine (resolution)Other301 for, 103 against, 33 abstained Adopted For 69 %r · shared0.77 385 voters
8 Jul 2026Separate vote on recital G EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)Separate vote434 for, 216 against, 13 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.76 585 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 119 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment357 for, 206 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by Patriots, Greensr · shared0.76 493 voters
19 Jun 2025Paragraph 8 — part 2 Clean Industrial DealSplit vote389 for, 168 against, 12 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.75 494 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 13 — part 2 — Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing”. Vote, 10 March 2026. votingId 187192, reference 2025/2070(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187192 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-10/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-03-10-187192,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 13 — part 2 — Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-10},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187192}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187192},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 187192, reference 2025/2070(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10 (CC BY 4.0)}
}