Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 11 — part 3

Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing

Vote
Paragraph 11 — part 3
Decision
No. 6 of the sitting of 10 Mar 2026
Result
451 for · 147 against · 24 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
10 March 2026, 13:22
More facts (6)
Position
vote 24 of 260 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: EPP · split vote: Greens, ECR, The Left, Patriots
Official label
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 11/3
Text
Report A-10-2026-0025
Dossier
2025/2070(INI)
Vote id
187184
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 451 for, 147 against, 24 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 73 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “abusive”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 35Abst. 0No vote 11 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 45Abst. 1No vote 7 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 106Against 15Abst. 0No vote 14 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.81
RenewFor 67Against 2Abst. 0No vote 7 of 76Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
EPPFor 156Against 5Abst. 2No vote 23 of 186Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
ECRFor 59Against 6Abst. 6No vote 8 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.75
PatriotsFor 44Against 11Abst. 10No vote 19 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.52
ESNFor 1Against 21Abst. 3No vote 3 of 28Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.76
No groupFor 18Against 7Abst. 2No vote 4 of 31Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria030
Czechia100
Germany0130
Hungary001
Italy001
Lithuania001
Poland030
Slovakia020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 622 members

No vote recorded, 96

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 96 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
22 May 2025Final vote Amendments to the Capital Requirements Regulation as regards securities financing transactions under the net stable funding ratioFinal436 for, 149 against, 11 abstained Adopted For 73 %r · shared0.81 512 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 120 to Article 19, after paragraph 1 (corresponds to Article 22 in am 120) — part 3 Generalised scheme of tariff preferencesAmendment502 for, 128 against, 16 abstained Adopted For 78 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.76 569 voters
23 Jan 2025Paragraph 5 — part 1 Situation in Venezuela following the usurpation of the presidency on 10 January 2025Split vote467 for, 116 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 77 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.75 530 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
10 Sept 2025Final vote on the draft Council decision EC-Pacific States Interim Partnership Agreement: accession of VanuatuFinal528 for, 89 against, 48 abstained Adopted For 79 %r · shared0.75 576 voters
9 Sept 2025Final vote on the draft Council decision EU-Kyrgyz Republic Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation AgreementFinal473 for, 114 against, 58 abstained Adopted For 73 %r · shared0.74 563 voters
16 Dec 2025Final vote — text as a whole Relations between the EU and Saudi ArabiaFinal417 for, 131 against, 108 abstained Adopted For 64 %r · shared0.73 573 voters
21 Jan 2025Final vote on the draft Council decision EU/Republic of Serbia agreement on operational activities carried out by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency in the Republic of SerbiaFinal505 for, 90 against, 43 abstained Adopted For 79 %r · shared0.73 554 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 371 to Annex VII, Part C, point 13 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment530 for, 112 against, 4 abstained Adopted For 82 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.72 562 voters
20 May 2026Final vote on the draft Council decision EU-Uzbekistan Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation AgreementFinal493 for, 104 against, 45 abstained Adopted For 77 %r · shared0.72 564 voters
20 May 2026Final vote on the draft Council decision United Nations Convention against CybercrimeFinal497 for, 91 against, 46 abstained Adopted For 78 %r · shared0.71 558 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187184
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 11 — part 3 — Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing”. Vote, 10 March 2026. votingId 187184, reference 2025/2070(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187184 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-10/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-03-10-187184,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 11 — part 3 — Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-10},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187184}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187184},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 187184, reference 2025/2070(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10 (CC BY 4.0)}
}