Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 6, after recital E

Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024

Vote
Amendment 6, after recital E
Decision
No. 7 of the sitting of 10 Mar 2026
Result
181 for · 426 against · 0 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
10 March 2026, 14:07
More facts (6)
Position
vote 14 of 15 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots
Official label
A10-0011/2026 – Veronika Cifrová Ostrihoňová – After recital E – Am 6
Text
Report A-10-2026-0011
Dossier
2025/2137(INI)
Vote id
186898
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 181 for, 426 against, 0 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 30 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 35Abst. 0No vote 11 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 47Abst. 0No vote 6 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 120Abst. 0No vote 15 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 67Abst. 0No vote 9 of 76Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 6Against 154Abst. 0No vote 26 of 186Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
ECRFor 71Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 65Against 0Abst. 0No vote 19 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 21Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 28Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 18Against 3Abst. 0No vote 10 of 31Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Renew members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria020
Belgium050
Bulgaria030
Germany060
Denmark040
Estonia010
Spain010
Finland030
France0120
Ireland050
Italy010
Lithuania020
Luxembourg010
Latvia010
Netherlands070
Portugal020
Romania020
Sweden030
Slovenia020
Slovakia040

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 607 members

No vote recorded, 111

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 111 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
20 May 2026Amendment 1, adding text after recital C Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseAmendment201 for, 438 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.99 552 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 1 Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseAmendment193 for, 431 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.98 542 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 5 to recital N EU-Uzbekistan Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (resolution)Amendment191 for, 448 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.98 556 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
16 Jun 2026Amendment 3, adding text after recital A European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities fundedAmendment202 for, 461 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.98 567 voters
16 Jun 2026Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 20 European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities fundedAmendment202 for, 463 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.98 567 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 47 EU-Uzbekistan Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (resolution)Amendment185 for, 446 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.98 557 voters
16 Jun 2026Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 20 European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities fundedAmendment202 for, 465 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.98 567 voters
11 Mar 2026Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 24 European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026Amendment184 for, 441 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.98 583 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 3 to recital F The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basinsAmendment198 for, 440 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.98 552 voters
18 May 2026Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the PfE Group — Terrorist attack in Modena Final vote Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group – Terrorist attack in ModenaOther134 for, 309 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 30 %r · shared0.98 375 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/186898
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
26 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 6, after recital E — Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024”. Vote, 10 March 2026. votingId 186898, reference 2025/2137(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/186898 (retrieved 26 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-10/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-03-10-186898,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 6, after recital E — Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-10},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/186898}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/186898},
  urldate = {2026-09-26},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 186898, reference 2025/2137(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10 (CC BY 4.0)}
}