Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 11 to paragraph 26

Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024

Vote
Amendment 11 to paragraph 26
Result
170 for · 426 against · 8 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
10 March 2026, 14:05
More facts (6)
Position
vote 3 of 15 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ESN
Official label
A10-0011/2026 – Veronika Cifrová Ostrihoňová – § 26 – Am 11
Vote id
186887
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 170 for, 426 against, 8 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 28 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 37Abst. 0No vote 9 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 47Abst. 0No vote 6 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 118Abst. 0No vote 17 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 66Abst. 0No vote 10 of 76Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 4Against 155Abst. 0No vote 27 of 186Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
ECRFor 68Against 0Abst. 1No vote 10 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
PatriotsFor 58Against 0Abst. 6No vote 20 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.86
ESNFor 23Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 28Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 17Against 3Abst. 1No vote 10 of 31Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria020
Belgium020
Czechia010
Germany0140
Denmark030
Spain030
Finland020
France030
Croatia010
Italy030
Lithuania010
Luxembourg010
Latvia010
Netherlands060
Romania010
Sweden030

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 604 members

No vote recorded, 114

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 114 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
11 Mar 2026Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 24 European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026Amendment184 for, 441 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.99 574 voters
16 Jun 2026Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 20 European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities fundedAmendment202 for, 465 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.98 562 voters
12 Mar 2026Amendment 24 to paragraph 14 Activities of the European Ombudsman – annual report 2024Amendment161 for, 392 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.98 511 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
16 Jun 2026Amendment 3, adding text after recital A European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities fundedAmendment202 for, 461 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.98 562 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 81 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionAmendment190 for, 443 against, 19 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.98 560 voters
16 Jun 2026Amendment 2 to recital A European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities fundedAmendment191 for, 467 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.98 564 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 3 to paragraph 77 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAmendment196 for, 422 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.98 538 voters
16 Jun 2026Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 20 European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities fundedAmendment202 for, 463 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.98 563 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 27, adding text after paragraph 19 Discharge 2024: AgenciesAmendment200 for, 432 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.98 545 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 13 to paragraph 22 Discharge 2024: AgenciesAmendment209 for, 433 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.98 554 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 11 to paragraph 26 — Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024”. Vote, 10 March 2026. votingId 186887, reference 2025/2137(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/186887 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-10/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-03-10-186887,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 11 to paragraph 26 — Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-10},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/186887}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/186887},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 186887, reference 2025/2137(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10 (CC BY 4.0)}
}