Skip to content

Vote · Final vote

Final vote on the whole text

Copyright and generative artificial intelligence – opportunities and challenges

Vote
Final vote on the whole text
Result
460 for · 71 against · 88 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
10 March 2026, 14:09
More facts (6)
Effect
Adopted — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 3 of 3 on the decision
Official label
A10-0019/2026 – Axel Voss – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Vote id
186169
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 460 for, 71 against, 88 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 74 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Adopted.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 34Against 0Abst. 4No vote 8 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.84
GreensFor 40Against 0Abst. 7No vote 6 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.78
S&DFor 119Against 3Abst. 0No vote 13 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
RenewFor 62Against 1Abst. 4No vote 9 of 76Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.89
EPPFor 151Against 9Abst. 3No vote 23 of 186Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.89
ECRFor 33Against 25Abst. 15No vote 6 of 79Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.18
PatriotsFor 1Against 17Abst. 46No vote 20 of 84Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.58
ESNFor 2Against 16Abst. 4No vote 6 of 28Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.59
No groupFor 18Against 0Abst. 5No vote 8 of 31Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria050
Belgium002
Czechia070
Denmark001
Spain004
France0021
Greece001
Hungary106
Italy006
Latvia001
Netherlands050
Poland002
Portugal002

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 619 members

No vote recorded, 99

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 99 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Sept 2026Amendment 42, adding text after citation 5 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment439 for, 128 against, 30 abstained Adopted For 74 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.73 512 voters
17 Sept 2026Separate vote on recital A The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersSeparate vote459 for, 120 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 78 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.73 506 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 40, adding text after citation 1 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment392 for, 132 against, 62 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.73 504 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
11 Mar 2026Final vote — text as a whole Framework Agreement on relations between the European Parliament and the European CommissionFinal446 for, 100 against, 72 abstained Adopted For 72 %r · shared0.73 582 voters
29 Apr 2026Paragraph 101 — part 1 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote449 for, 141 against, 53 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.72 565 voters
21 Oct 2025Final vote on the motion for a resolution A new legislative framework for products that is fit for the digital and sustainable transitionFinal505 for, 62 against, 47 abstained Adopted For 82 %r · shared0.71 536 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 12 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment390 for, 143 against, 64 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.71 511 voters
7 Jul 2026Separate vote on paragraph 14 A new strategy for media literacy and digital learningSeparate vote455 for, 151 against, 41 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.71 560 voters
21 May 2026Separate vote on paragraph 81 Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gapSeparate vote307 for, 146 against, 58 abstained Adopted For 60 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.71 452 voters
7 Jul 2026Paragraph 27 — part 2 A new strategy for media literacy and digital learningSplit vote497 for, 138 against, 17 abstained Adopted For 76 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.70 564 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 3 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Final vote on the whole text — Copyright and generative artificial intelligence – opportunities and challenges”. Vote, 10 March 2026. votingId 186169, reference 2025/2058(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/186169 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-10/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-03-10-186169,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Final vote on the whole text — Copyright and generative artificial intelligence – opportunities and challenges}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-10},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/186169}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/186169},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 186169, reference 2025/2058(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10 (CC BY 4.0)}
}