Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Final vote

Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the PfE Group

Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group

Vote
Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the PfE Group
Decision
No. 1 of the sitting of 9 Mar 2026
Result
87 for · 291 against · 22 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
9 March 2026, 17:15
More facts (4)
Effect
Rejected — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 1 of 1 on the decision
Official label
Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group
Vote id
188549
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 87 for, 291 against, 22 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 22 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Rejected.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 22Abst. 0No vote 24 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 41Abst. 0No vote 12 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 70Abst. 0No vote 65 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 45Abst. 0No vote 31 of 76Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 2Against 106Abst. 3No vote 75 of 186Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
ECRFor 11Against 6Abst. 16No vote 46 of 79Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.23
PatriotsFor 49Against 0Abst. 0No vote 35 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 14Against 0Abst. 0No vote 14 of 28Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 11Against 1Abst. 3No vote 16 of 31Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria400
Belgium100
Czechia700
Spain400
France1900
Greece100
Hungary500
Italy100
Netherlands500
Poland100
Portugal100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 400 members

No vote recorded, 318

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 318 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
27 Nov 2025Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 1 EU position on the proposed plan and EU engagement towards a just and lasting peace for UkraineAmendment122 for, 391 against, 63 abstained Rejected For 21 %Requested by S&D, Patriotsr · shared0.95 346 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 12 to recital Q Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2024Amendment141 for, 464 against, 70 abstained Rejected For 21 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.94 378 voters
22 Oct 2025Amendment 132, adding text after paragraph 27 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sectionsAmendment186 for, 454 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 368 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
10 Mar 2026Amendment 1 to paragraph 4 The upcoming European Research Area (ERA) ActAmendment161 for, 428 against, 21 abstained Rejected For 26 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 381 voters
10 Mar 2025Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the ESN Group Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the ESN GroupOther109 for, 317 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 25 %r · shared0.94 293 voters
14 Nov 2024Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 15 EU actions against the Russian shadow fleets and ensuring a full enforcement of sanctions against RussiaAmendment131 for, 444 against, 57 abstained Rejected For 21 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 363 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 68, adding text after paragraph 26 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment186 for, 484 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 377 voters
25 Nov 2025Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 1 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedAmendment186 for, 447 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.94 371 voters
31 Mar 2025Tuesday's agenda — Request by the PfE Group Final vote Tuesday's agenda – Request by the PfE GroupOther118 for, 326 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 26 %r · shared0.94 310 voters
25 Nov 2025Amendment 9 to paragraph 2 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedAmendment184 for, 450 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.94 370 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 1 connection: The decision

The decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-09/188549
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the PfE Group — Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group”. Vote, 9 March 2026. votingId 188549. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-09/188549 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 9 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-09-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 9 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-09-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-09, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-09/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-03-09-188549,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the PfE Group — Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-09},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-09/188549}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-09/188549},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 188549. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-09-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-09-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-09 (CC BY 4.0)}
}