Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Decision

Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group

Effect
Rejected
Result
87 for · 291 against · 22 abstained roll call
Date
9 March 2026, 17:15
Kind
Agenda vote
More facts (4)
Margin
by a large majority
Votes
1 vote · 1 roll call
Sitting
Monday 9 March 2026
Final vote
188549
More
Cite this page Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page
Votes on this decision
Members on the final vote

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Final vote: 87 for, 291 against, 22 abstained (roll call).

Rejected by a large majority.

The agenda was left unchanged.

Backed by Patriots and ESN; opposed by The Left, Greens, S&D, Renew and EPP; ECR mostly abstained.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 22Abst. 0No vote 24 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 41Abst. 0No vote 12 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 70Abst. 0No vote 65 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 45Abst. 0No vote 31 of 76Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 2Against 106Abst. 3No vote 75 of 186Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
ECRFor 11Against 6Abst. 16No vote 46 of 79Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.23
PatriotsFor 49Against 0Abst. 0No vote 35 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 14Against 0Abst. 0No vote 14 of 28Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 11Against 1Abst. 3No vote 16 of 31Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Voted against their group, 5

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast, at least 10 members voting) of the group they sat in that day. A group without a clear line is divided and not counted.

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

Votes by country (27 delegations)
Members' votes by country. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Cohesion: Agreement Index of the delegation, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all the same; it reflects the mix of groups (method).
CountryForAgainstAbst.No voteCohesion
Austria413030.65
Belgium1101100.75
Bulgaria16010—
Cyprus1104—
Czechia88050.25
Germany14451350.63
Denmark011041.00
Estonia0007—
Spain4290270.82
Finland010051.00
France19232370.28
Greece181110.70
Croatia0309—
Hungary80013—
Ireland04010—
Italy22212400.42
Lithuania0506—
Luxembourg1401—
Latvia0405—
Malta0303—
Netherlands522130.68
Poland9212210.48
Portugal18012—
Romania35124—
Sweden014071.00
Slovenia0711—
Slovakia55050.25

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 400 members

All votes on this decision, 1

In voting order. Result: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
1Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the PfE Group Final vote Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group Roll call87 for, 291 against, 22 abstained Rejected

Text

The text voted on.

Parliament’s vote records link no text to this decision.

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

Show 5 connections: Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-03-09/1
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group”. Decision, 9 March 2026. votingId 188549. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-03-09/1 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 9 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-09-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 9 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-09-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-09, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-09/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-decision-2026-03-09-1,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-09},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-03-09/1}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-03-09/1},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 188549. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-09-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-09-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-09 (CC BY 4.0)}
}